Descriptor
Evaluation Methods | 5 |
Federal Programs | 5 |
Program Evaluation | 5 |
Evaluators | 3 |
Evaluation Utilization | 2 |
Public Policy | 2 |
Accountability | 1 |
Agency Cooperation | 1 |
Case Studies | 1 |
Cross Cultural Studies | 1 |
Cultural Context | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
New Directions for Program… | 5 |
Author
Chelimsky, Eleanor | 2 |
Hendricks, Michael | 1 |
Mayne, John | 1 |
Morra, Linda G. | 1 |
Rutman, Len | 1 |
Stalford, Charles | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 5 |
Reports - Descriptive | 5 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Canada | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Hendricks, Michael – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1981
An innovative new evaluation unit in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is detailed. This unit, the Office of Service Delivery Assessment (SDA), regularly briefs the Secretary on the services delivered to clients at the local level. The process of the SDA is described and conclusions are offered. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Delivery Systems, Evaluation Methods, Federal Programs, Human Services

Chelimsky, Eleanor – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1987
Evaluation must take into account both executive and legislative politics and their interactions. A five-part continuum evaluation process is suggested for the development of a policy question and its translation into knowledge that is credible, timely, responsive, and usable. Evaluators have a major responsibility in this process. (Author/JAZ)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs, Evaluation Utilization

Chelimsky, Eleanor; Morra, Linda G. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1984
Evaluation synthesis, a meta-evaluation method developed by the General Accounting Office to improve evaluation utilization by legislators, is described. It is designed to: (1) focus on the information needs and priorities of legislators, and (2) ensure continuous communication between sponsor and evaluator. The strengths and limitations of this…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Federal Programs, Information Needs

Rutman, Len; Mayne, John – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1985
The substantial differences in program evaluation practices in Canada and the United States are discussed focussing on the historical context and the political and cultural environments. Program evaluation has developed in Canada to address the concerns of accountability of public funds in a context of economic restraint. (Author/BS)
Descriptors: Accountability, Cross Cultural Studies, Cultural Context, Evaluation Methods

Stalford, Charles – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1980
In one federally funded program, the third-party evaluator was under contract with the program evaluated and not the federal funding agency. The social structure of this arrangement has implications for information utilization. (Available from: Jossey-Bass, Inc., 433 California St., San Francisco, CA 94104, single issue, $6.95.) (Author/GDC)
Descriptors: Agency Cooperation, Case Studies, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators