Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Family Programs | 2 |
| At Risk Students | 1 |
| Case Studies | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Empowerment | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Evaluation Research | 1 |
| Family School Relationship | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Outcomes of Education | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Evaluation and Program… | 2 |
Author
| Duncan, Stephen F. | 1 |
| Dunnagan, Tim | 1 |
| Illback, Robert J. | 1 |
| Kalafat, John | 1 |
| Paul, Lynn | 1 |
| Sanders, Daniel, Jr. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedDunnagan, Tim; Duncan, Stephen F.; Paul, Lynn – Evaluation and Program Planning, 2000
Presents a comprehensive evaluation framework and applies it to a family empowerment program in Montana that was developed as an aspect of welfare reform. The framework encompasses seven areas from developing objectives to developing a sound conceptual framework. (SLD)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Empowerment, Evaluation Methods, Family Programs
Direct linkKalafat, John; Illback, Robert J.; Sanders, Daniel, Jr. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 2007
There is increasing recognition of the need for evaluations that identify program processes or mediators and assess degree of program implementation rather than focusing solely on outcome evaluation. This paper describes the application of complementary qualitative and quantitative evaluation procedures to assess the degree of implementation of…
Descriptors: Program Development, At Risk Students, Correlation, Family Programs
