Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Generative Grammar | 3 |
| Context Effect | 2 |
| Sentence Structure | 2 |
| Algebra | 1 |
| Comprehension | 1 |
| Computational Linguistics | 1 |
| Concept Formation | 1 |
| Concept Mapping | 1 |
| Educational Experiments | 1 |
| Inferences | 1 |
| Language Acquisition | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Cognitive Science | 3 |
Author
| Delle Luche, Claire | 1 |
| Gorniak, Peter | 1 |
| Noveck, Ira A. | 1 |
| Politzer, Guy | 1 |
| Roy, Deb | 1 |
| Stabler, Edward P. | 1 |
| Van der Henst, Jean-Baptiste | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Gorniak, Peter; Roy, Deb – Cognitive Science, 2007
We introduce a computational theory of situated language understanding in which the meaning of words and utterances depends on the physical environment and the goals and plans of communication partners. According to the theory, concepts that ground linguistic meaning are neither internal nor external to language users, but instead span the…
Descriptors: Physical Environment, Linguistic Theory, Computational Linguistics, Concept Formation
Stabler, Edward P. – Cognitive Science, 2004
Four different kinds of grammars that can define crossing dependencies in human language are compared here: (1) "context sensitive rewrite" grammars with rules that depend on context; (2) "matching" grammars with constraints that filter the generative structure of the language; (3) "copying" grammars which can copy structures of unbounded size;…
Descriptors: Language Usage, Sentence Structure, Context Effect, Generative Grammar
Politzer, Guy; Van der Henst, Jean-Baptiste; Delle Luche, Claire; Noveck, Ira A. – Cognitive Science, 2006
We present a set-theoretic model of the mental representation of classically quantified sentences (All P are Q, Some P are Q, Some P are not Q, and No P are Q). We take inclusion, exclusion, and their negations to be primitive concepts. We show that although these sentences are known to have a diagrammatic expression (in the form of the Gergonne…
Descriptors: Models, Sentence Structure, Semantics, Prediction

Peer reviewed
Direct link
