Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 3 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 11 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Guskey, Thomas R. | 22 |
| Jung, Lee Ann | 3 |
| Gersten, Russell | 1 |
| McTighe, Jay | 1 |
| Nordengren, Chase | 1 |
| Royal, Kenneth D. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Descriptive | 22 |
| Journal Articles | 16 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 4 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Guskey, Thomas R.; McTighe, Jay – Educational Leadership, 2016
Nearly every modern instructional planning model, differentiation approach, and personalized learning system incorporates some form of re-assessment. Yet there's scant research evidence that teachers use pre-assessment in ways that improve learning, according to Guskey and McTighe. To increase the likelihood that pre-assessment will be worth the…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Teaching Methods, Evaluation Methods, Educational Improvement
Guskey, Thomas R. – Learning Professional, 2020
According to a recent research study, teachers attributed students' performance to their instruction only 15% of the time. Far more frequently, they connected results to student characteristics, particularly students' behavior, effort, or background. It's been long known that individual student characteristics, family background, and neighborhood…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Teacher Attitudes, Beliefs, Teacher Influence
Where Do You Want to Get To? Effective Professional Learning Begins with a Clear Destination in Mind
Guskey, Thomas R. – Learning Professional, 2017
Educators often shy away from evaluating professional learning experiences because they believe the process requires knowledge and skills they don't possess. As a result, they either neglect evaluation procedures completely or leave them to "experts" who come in at the end and gather data to determine if anything made a difference. But…
Descriptors: Faculty Development, Program Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Educational Quality
Nordengren, Chase; Guskey, Thomas R. – Learning Professional, 2020
The importance of high-quality evaluation is underscored in Learning Forward's Standards for Professional Learning: Evaluation provides information that supports advocates, professional learning planners, and anyone who wants to know "about the contribution of professional learning to student achievement" (Learning Forward, 2011). Most…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Faculty Development, Academic Achievement, Decision Making
Royal, Kenneth D.; Guskey, Thomas R. – Online Submission, 2014
A common practice in medical education is to create a prescribed distribution of grades, or ratings, so that only a certain percentage of students receive the highest marks. This approach typically is employed to curb grade inflation and as a means to help faculty distinguish outstanding performers. Despite the well-intentioned reasoning for using…
Descriptors: Grades (Scholastic), Grading, Medical Education, Grade Inflation
Guskey, Thomas R. – Educational Leadership, 2011
Educators seeking to reform grading must combat five long-held traditions that stand as formidable obstacles to change: (1) Grades should provide the basis for differentiating students; (2) grade distributions should resemble a bell-shaped curve; (3) grades should be based on students' standing among classmates; (4) poor grades prompt students to…
Descriptors: Grades (Scholastic), Academic Achievement, Grading, Educational Change
Jung, Lee Ann; Guskey, Thomas R. – Principal Leadership, 2011
Despite the many changes in education over the past century, grading and reporting practices have essentially remained the same. In part, this is because few teacher preparation programs offer any guidance on sound grading practices. As a result, most current grading practices are grounded in tradition, rather than research on best practice. In an…
Descriptors: Grading, Teaching Methods, Academic Standards, Disabilities
Grading and Reporting in a Standards-Based Environment: Implications for Students with Special Needs
Guskey, Thomas R.; Jung, Lee Ann – Theory Into Practice, 2009
Teachers at all levels of education today struggle in their efforts to assign fair, accurate, and meaningful grades to students with disabilities, especially those placed in general education classrooms. Lacking specific policies or recommendations, most teachers apply informal, individual grading adaptations for such students. Although these…
Descriptors: Grades (Scholastic), Disabilities, Classroom Environment, Special Needs Students
Guskey, Thomas R. – Educational Leadership, 2010
Schools are frequently inundated with demands to implement new instructional interventions and teaching methods that are not yet backed up by a solid body of research. Fortunately, many of these innovations include elements of more established strategies for which evidence of positive effects does exist. Guskey describes the core elements of one…
Descriptors: Mastery Learning, Teaching Methods, Response to Intervention, Feedback (Response)
Jung, Lee Ann; Guskey, Thomas R. – Educational Leadership, 2010
Teachers often grapple with the challenge of giving report card grades to students with learning disabilities and English language learners. The authors offer a five-step model that "offers a fair, accurate, and legal way to adapt the grading process for exceptional learners." The model begins with a high-quality reporting system for all students…
Descriptors: Report Cards, Student Needs, Grades (Scholastic), Learning Disabilities
Guskey, Thomas R. – Journal of Advanced Academics, 2007
The problem of achievement gaps among different subgroups of students has been evident in education for many years. This manuscript revisits the work of renowned educator Benjamin S. Bloom, who saw reducing gaps in the achievement of various groups of students as a simple problem of reducing variation in student learning outcomes. Bloom observed…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Mastery Learning, Teaching Methods, Achievement Gains
Guskey, Thomas R. – Principal, 1988
Explains the distinct features of both mastery learning and mastery teaching systems, highlighting their major foci, strengths, and weaknesses. Despite their differences, the systems can complement each other by providing teachers with powerful tools to enhance their instructional effectiveness. Includes 21 references. (MLH)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Instructional Improvement, Learning Strategies, Teacher Effectiveness
Guskey, Thomas R. – 1999
Basic questions about the evaluation of professional development efforts are explored, including the nature and purposes of evaluation, the critical levels of professional development evaluation, and the difference between evidence and proof in evaluation. Evaluation, which is defined as the systematic investigation of merit or worth, can be…
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Data Collection, Evaluation Methods, Professional Development
Guskey, Thomas R. – NASSP Bulletin, 2005
Although much has been written recently about gaps in the achievement of different groups of students, the problem has been with us for many years. This manuscript presents a historical perspective of the problem, viewing it as one of reducing variation in students' achievement. Specifically, it reviews the work of renowned educator Benjamin S.…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Teaching Methods, Educational History, Mastery Learning
Guskey, Thomas R.; And Others – Instructor, 1980
This overview is presented in three sections. Thomas Guskey outlines the development of mastery learning, its application in the classroom, and its benefits and drawbacks. LuOuida Phillips answers questions about the student's role in mastery learning. Kay Miller describes the success of mastery learning at Westover School. (SJL)
Descriptors: Educational Strategies, Elementary Education, Mastery Learning, Program Effectiveness
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2
Direct link
Peer reviewed
