Descriptor
| Language Tests | 4 |
| Testing | 4 |
| Language Proficiency | 3 |
| Oral Language | 2 |
| Second Language Learning | 2 |
| Accountability | 1 |
| Applied Linguistics | 1 |
| Communicative Competence… | 1 |
| Construct Validity | 1 |
| Criticism | 1 |
| Educational History | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Descriptive | 4 |
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Australia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| ACTFL Oral Proficiency… | 4 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Valdman, Albert – 1988
This paper presents a report of a 1987 symposium on the Evaluation of Foreign Language Proficiency held in Bloomington, Indiana. Although much has been accomplished in language testing, much remains to be done before the language teaching profession has at its disposal a common means of measuring proficiency in the functional use of language in…
Descriptors: Educational Trends, Evaluation Criteria, Language Proficiency, Language Tests
Herzog, Martha – Foreign Language Annals, 2003
The ACTFL oral proficiency interview (OPI) and the Interagency Language Roundtable (ILR) scale provide both a testing method and a set of rating factors for evaluating proficiency. Both are closely related to actual language tasks identified as critical for government employees. Over time, the scale has been expanded to include four skills, a…
Descriptors: Second Language Learning, Government Employees, Testing, Measures (Individuals)
Liskin-Gasparro, Judith E. – Foreign Language Annals, 2003
The ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines (ACTFL, 1982; 1986; Breiner-Sanders et al.,2000) and the Oral Proficiency Interview (OPI) derived from them have stimulated abundant and sustained professional engagement by foreign language teachers at all levels and in all languages, as well as intense and equally sustained criticism by specialists in foreign…
Descriptors: Second Language Learning, Testing, Language Tests, Guidelines
McNamara, Tim – Language Assessment Quarterly, 2006
The thought of Samuel Messick has influenced language testing in 2 main ways: in proposing a new understanding of how inferences made based on tests must be challenged, and in drawing attention to the consequences of test use. The former has had a powerful impact on language-testing research, most notably in Bachman's work on validity and the…
Descriptors: Test Use, Testing, Language Tests, Validity

Peer reviewed
Direct link
