Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 7 |
Descriptor
| Psychological Testing | 10 |
| Scores | 10 |
| Validity | 6 |
| Educational Testing | 4 |
| Inferences | 3 |
| Measurement | 3 |
| Standards | 3 |
| Test Use | 3 |
| Tests | 3 |
| Correlation | 2 |
| Definitions | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
Publication Type
| Opinion Papers | 10 |
| Journal Articles | 9 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - General | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Canada | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Bennett, Randy Elliot – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2012
This article presents the author's response to Paul E. Newton's paper titled "Clarifying the Consensus Definition of Validity" ("Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives," 2012). Newton's paper offers an interesting and constructive discussion about how people think about validity. In this reaction, the author comments on some of…
Descriptors: Validity, Psychological Testing, Standards, Content Validity
Engelhard, George, Jr.; Behizadeh, Nadia – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2012
In his article, Paul E. Newton has conducted a review of selected perspectives on validity theory with the goal of disambiguating the definition of validity and describing a consensus definition of validity. Newton provides a nuanced discussion of the evolution of the concept of validity over the years. His Focus article has two major goals: (1)…
Descriptors: Validity, Psychological Testing, Researchers, Definitions
Cramer, Angelique O. J. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2012
What is validity? A simple question but apparently one with many answers, as Paul Newton highlights in his review of the history of validity. The current definition of validity, as entertained in the 1999 "Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing" is indeed a consensus, one between the classical notion of attributes, and measures…
Descriptors: Validity, Educational Testing, Depression (Psychology), Psychology
Hood, S. Brian – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2012
Paul E. Newton argues in favor of a conception of validity, viz, "the consensus definition of validity," according to which the extension of the predicate "is valid" is a subset of "assessment-based decision-making procedure[s], which [are] underwritten by an argument that the assessment procedure can be used to measure the attribute entailed by…
Descriptors: Validity, Test Construction, Definitions, Psychological Testing
Murphy, Kevin R. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2012
As Paul Newton so ably demonstrates, the concept of validity is both important and problematic. Over the last several decades, a consensus definition of validity has emerged; the current edition of "Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing" notes, "Validity refers to the degree to which evidence and theory support the interpretations of…
Descriptors: Evidence, Validity, Educational Testing, Psychological Testing
Mislevy, Robert J. – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2012
Paul E. Newton's "Clarifying the Consensus Definition of Validity" addresses the single most important, yet stubbornly protean, value in educational and psychological assessment. "Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing" (American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in…
Descriptors: Evidence, Validity, Educational Testing, Psychological Evaluation
Peer reviewedAnastasi, Anne – Public Personnel Management, 1989
Discusses the changes in psychological testing and the rapidity of their development. Describes trends in the role of the test user, technical methodology of test construction, and interpretation of test scores. (Author)
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Psychological Testing, Scores, Test Construction
Jensen, Arthur R. – 1981
The specificity doctrine, holds that psychometric tests measure nothing other than the specific bits of knowledge and learned skills reflected in the item content of the tests. This prevailing doctrine has influenced the interpretation of test scores and the conceptualization of test validity, as well as the practical use of tests in educational…
Descriptors: Cognitive Tests, Correlation, Court Litigation, Intelligence Differences
Trafimow, David; Rice, Stephen – Psychological Review, 2008
People can use a variety of different strategies to perform tasks and these strategies all have two characteristics in common. First, they can be evaluated in comparison with either an absolute or a relative standard. Second, they can be used at varying levels of consistency. In the present article, the authors develop a general theory of task…
Descriptors: Behavior Theories, Performance, Scores, Performance Factors
Anderson, Kent E.; And Others – School Guidance Worker, 1984
Presents nine articles dealing with aspects of testing and the role of the school counselor. Topics include interpreting test scores, testing problems and solutions, developing tests to predict dropping out, sex bias in vocational testing, detecting bias in standardized tests, assessments of reentry adults, and interest tests for adults. (JAC)
Descriptors: Adults, Children, Counselor Role, Dropout Prevention

Direct link
