Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
| Performance and Instruction | 2 |
| Educational Technology | 1 |
| Journal of Experimental… | 1 |
| Journal of Instructional… | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
| Opinion Papers | 9 |
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 4 |
| Information Analyses | 3 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Community | 1 |
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Roelofs, Ardi; Piai, Vitoria; Schriefers, Herbert – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2011
E. Dhooge and R. J. Hartsuiker (2010) reported experiments showing that picture naming takes longer with low- than high-frequency distractor words, replicating M. Miozzo and A. Caramazza (2003). In addition, they showed that this distractor-frequency effect disappears when distractors are masked or preexposed. These findings were taken to refute…
Descriptors: Attention Control, Attention, Experiments, Semantics
Sherman, Thomas M.; Wildman, Terry M. – 1980
An examination of task analysis from several perspectives in order to identify some of its purposes and advantages reveals that, as the interest in learning theory has shifted from a predominately behavioral perspective to a more cognitive orientation, the purpose of task analysis has also shifted. Formerly the purpose of task analysis was to aid…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Content Analysis, Instructional Design, Learning Theories
Jonassen, David H. – 1981
Conceptual and methodological problems inherent in Aptitude Treatment Interaction (ATI) research, coupled with the impracticality of its application, call into question its use as a design model. For these reasons, ATI should be de-emphasized as an instructional design model and attention should be refocused on the structure of content and the…
Descriptors: Aptitude Treatment Interaction, Cognitive Processes, Content Analysis, Individual Differences
Tiemann, Philip W.; Markle, Susan M. – Performance and Instruction, 1984
Discusses the relationship between the problems involved in the creation of expert systems by knowledge engineers, i.e., experts at translating human abilities and knowledge into computer programs, and the major issues dealt with in the planning/analysis phases of instructional development. (MBR)
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Comparative Analysis, Computer Software, Content Analysis
Reigeluth, Charles M.; And Others – Performance and Instruction, 1981
Distinguishes between the process and products of science and describes the role of each in Instructional Development (ID). The observe, hypothesize, test components of the scientific process are examined as they apply to front-end analysis, instructional strategy description, and formative evaluation stages used in ID models. Thirty-four…
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Educational Strategies, Flow Charts, Formative Evaluation
Tennyson, Robert D.; And Others – 1991
This paper discusses two related areas in which recent advancements in cognitive science and educational technology may affect instructional design theory. These are: (1) the analysis of information-to-be-learned; and (2) the linkage of learning theory to instructional prescriptions. The first area proposes extensions to current methods of…
Descriptors: Behavioral Objectives, Cognitive Psychology, Content Analysis, Educational Strategies
Tennyson, Robert D. – Educational Technology, 1990
Discusses three major areas in which cognitive psychology and educational technology are affecting instructional design (ID) theory: (1) analysis of information, including content analysis and task analysis; (2) the means of evaluating learners; and (3) linking learning theory with specific instructional strategies through an integrated…
Descriptors: Cognitive Psychology, Content Analysis, Educational Technology, Instructional Design
Jonassen, David H.; Hannum, Wallace H. – Journal of Instructional Development, 1986
Describes functions comprising task analysis process--inventory, description, selection, sequencing, and analysis--and reviews distinctions between the micro/macro level, top-down/bottom-up, and job/learning task analysis processes. These functions and distinctions are combined into a quasi-algorithm suggesting which of 30 task analysis procedures…
Descriptors: Algorithms, Behavioral Objectives, Classification, Content Analysis
Tennyson, Robert D. – 1990
Scientific advancements in cognitive science and instructional technology extend the behaviorally-oriented learning paradigm of instructional design and management in three major areas: (1) analysis of information-to-be-learned; (2) means of evaluating learners; and (3) linkage of learning theory to instructional prescriptions. The two basic types…
Descriptors: Behavior Theories, Content Analysis, Context Effect, Diagnostic Teaching

Peer reviewed
Direct link
