NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Nageswara Rao, S. V.; And Others – Information Processing and Management, 1985
Discusses properties of multiple attribute tree (MAT) and inverted file structures; establishes suitability of MAT data structure for bibliographic files using worst-case performance measures; provides arguments to establish MAT average case superiority; and proposes an efficient adaptation of MAT data structure to exploit special features of MAT…
Descriptors: Algorithms, Comparative Analysis, Data Processing, Databases
Woolfe, Roger – Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 1981
Introduces the concept of home publishing on the television screen, and provides detailed descriptions of videotex and teletext, including their similarities, differences between them and future prospects for educational applications of these two new information services designed for use with adapted TVs. (CHC)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Data Processing, Futures (of Society), Information Services
Heydinger, Richard B.; Norris, Donald M. – CAUSE/EFFECT, 1979
Arguments for and against decentralization of data management, analysis, and planning systems are presented. It is suggested that technological advances have encouraged decentralization. Caution in this direction is urged and the development of an articulated decentralization program is proposed. (SF)
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Centralization, Change Strategies, College Planning
Chew, Robert L. – 1983
Reasons for distributed systems (DS) of planning and design for information services for colleges are discussed. The methodologies and approaches from industry and academe are contrasted to show how the process of DS can be effectively managed to meet a variety of institutional needs. DS represent a natural evolution of the historic development of…
Descriptors: Business, College Administration, College Planning, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Juergens, Bonnie; Blake, Ruth – Library Hi Tech, 1987
Compares and contrasts two systems designed for library automation applications--NOTIS, which was developed in the United States, and DOBIS, which was developed in Europe. The differences in the systems are discussed in terms of the availability or absence of machine readable bibliographic sharing capacities in the countries of origin. (CLB)
Descriptors: Access to Information, Bibliographies, Comparative Analysis, Computer Software