Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 6 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 30 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 104 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 170 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
| Higher Education | 54 |
| Elementary Education | 44 |
| Postsecondary Education | 44 |
| Secondary Education | 20 |
| Middle Schools | 18 |
| Grade 5 | 12 |
| Intermediate Grades | 12 |
| Grade 3 | 10 |
| Grade 2 | 9 |
| High Schools | 9 |
| Junior High Schools | 9 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Turkey | 8 |
| China | 6 |
| Indonesia | 6 |
| Iran | 4 |
| Japan | 4 |
| United Kingdom | 4 |
| United States | 4 |
| Canada | 3 |
| Philippines | 3 |
| Texas | 3 |
| Thailand | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 2 |
| Americans with Disabilities… | 1 |
| Rehabilitation Act 1973… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedKretschmer, Joseph C. – Journal of Reading, 1984
Provides a microcomputer program that will calculate readability levels using Rix, a new, short readability formula. (FL)
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Elementary Secondary Education, Microcomputers, Readability Formulas
Razek, Joseph R.; And Others – Journal of Business Education, 1982
This article describes the results of a survey of the readability of most of the intermediate and advanced accounting textbooks currently in use at colleges and universities throughout the United States. (CT)
Descriptors: Accounting, Higher Education, Measurement Techniques, Readability
Peer reviewedKeller, Paul F. G. – Reading Teacher, 1982
Discusses a prototype computer program designed to calculate readability levels and explains why such a program is needed. Calls for support from others who can assist in the program's development. (FL)
Descriptors: Computer Oriented Programs, Computer Programs, Computers, Readability Formulas
Warming, Eloise O.; Baber, Elizabeth Coe – Phi Delta Kappan, 1980
The authors present a 20-item inventory for textbook selection designed to supplement the Fry Formula or the Raygor Estimate readability tests. The authors argue that a harmonious relationship should exist between the text, its author, its intended readers, and the instructor. (Author/PGD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Guidelines, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewedPeterson, Lorna; Coniglio, Jamie W. – RQ, 1987
Library user guides from seven large academic libraries were examined for readability using microcomputer software for analysis. Results indicated that most guides are written at or above a reading level of grade 12. Appendices summarize readability formulas and depict in a composite graph the levels of all of the guides examined. (16 references)…
Descriptors: Academic Libraries, Computer Software, Graphs, Library Guides
Peer reviewedKoenke, Karl – Reading Teacher, 1987
Looks at ERIC documents that deal with readability concerns. (FL)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Readability, Readability Formulas, Reading Instruction
Peer reviewedKarlinsky, Stewart S.; Koch, Bruce S. – Journal of Business Communication, 1983
Found that standard readability indexes by themselves are not useful in measuring readability and comprehensibility of income tax material. Also casts doubt on the use of only readability indexes to measure insurance, labor, and real estate contracts. (PD)
Descriptors: College Students, Higher Education, Readability, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewedMaddux, Cleborne D.; And Others – Journal of Special Education, 1983
Twenty-four survey textbooks in special education, published between 1974 and 1982, were analyzed with formulae of R. Flesch to determine readability levels and human interest. Among results are that the texts are dull and difficult but usually complete in coverage, although some handicaps (e.g., severe/profound) receive scant coverage. (Authors)
Descriptors: Course Content, Higher Education, Readability, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewedBerndt, David J.; And Others – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1983
Obtained reading grade levels for depression scales by use of two empirically based readability formulae. Results showed Kovacs children's measure had the easiest reading level, the General Behavior Inventory was appropriate for college-level reading, and most other measures clustered at a fifth- to ninth-grade reading level. (WAS)
Descriptors: Affective Measures, Depression (Psychology), Readability, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewedAnderson, Jonathan – Journal of Reading, 1983
Indicates that the Rix modification of the Lix Readability Formula is easy to calculate, correlates highly with other popular formulas, and is useful for materials for grades 3 through 12. (AEA)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Readability Formulas, Test Reliability, Test Validity
Peer reviewedSchultheis, Robert A.; Anderson, Roberta – Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 1982
McLaughlin's Smog Index was compared to the Dale-Chall formula for the determination of reading levels of 48 textbooks in business and distributive education. A Modified Smog Index proved a valid substitute for the Dale-Chall formula when used to evaluate the reading levels of business and distributive education narrative. (Author/CT)
Descriptors: Business Education, Distributive Education, Readability, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewedBlanchard, Jay S. – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1981
The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory was analyzed by readability formulas which represent varying criterion of comprehension from 50 to 90 percent. If an examiner wishes to ensure 90 percent comprehension of the inventory items, nine years of successful schooling seem necessary. (Author/SJL)
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Difficulty Level, Personality Measures, Readability
Kennedy, Keith – Curriculum Review, 1979
After discussing the ease of using the Fry Readability Graph, the author applies it to biology, chemistry, and physics texts, and lists the results. He warns that textbook authors and classroom teachers should be aware of the potential impact that the reading level of a text can have on students. (KC)
Descriptors: Guidelines, Readability, Readability Formulas, Science Materials
Peer reviewedRazek, Joseph R.; Cone, Randy E. – Journal of Business Communication, 1981
Reports results of a survey on the readability of 12 recently published business communication textbooks. Shows that important differences in readability do exist and that the majority of texts were within or below the lower end of the undergraduate-level reading range. (PD)
Descriptors: Business Communication, Higher Education, Readability, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewedJudd, Dorothy H. – Reading Teacher, 1981
Argues that the use of microcomputers and prewritten computer programs can save teachers time and effort in calculating the readability levels of written materials. (FL)
Descriptors: Computer Science, Computers, Efficiency, Elementary Education


