Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Test Use | 10 |
| Standard Setting (Scoring) | 6 |
| Cutting Scores | 4 |
| Standard Setting | 4 |
| Standards | 4 |
| Academic Achievement | 3 |
| Educational Assessment | 3 |
| Test Validity | 3 |
| Testing Programs | 3 |
| Validity | 3 |
| Criterion Referenced Tests | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Linn, Robert L. | 2 |
| Baker, Eva L. | 1 |
| Bourque, Mary Lyn | 1 |
| Camara, Wayne | 1 |
| Cross, Lawrence H. | 1 |
| Darling-Hammond, Linda | 1 |
| Ferrara, Steven | 1 |
| Gross, Leon J. | 1 |
| Hambleton, Ronald K. | 1 |
| Koller, Olaf | 1 |
| Pant, Hans A. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 10 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 5 |
| Opinion Papers | 3 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - General | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| California (Los Angeles) | 1 |
| Florida | 1 |
| North Carolina (Charlotte) | 1 |
| Pennsylvania (Philadelphia) | 1 |
| United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| National Assessment of… | 1 |
| National Teacher Examinations | 1 |
| Test of English as a Foreign… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Camara, Wayne – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2014
This article reviews the intended uses of these college- and career-readiness assessments with the goal of articulating an appropriate validity argument to support such uses. These assessments differ fundamentally from today's state assessments employed for state accountability. Current assessments are used to determine if students have…
Descriptors: College Readiness, Career Readiness, Aptitude Tests, Test Use
Pant, Hans A.; Rupp, Andre A.; Tiffin-Richards, Simon P.; Koller, Olaf – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2009
Standard-setting procedures are a key component within many large-scale educational assessment systems. They are consensual approaches in which committees of experts set cut-scores on continuous proficiency scales, which facilitate communication of proficiency distributions of students to a wide variety of stakeholders. This communicative function…
Descriptors: Test Use, Educational Assessment, Validity, Standard Setting
Peer reviewedBourque, Mary Lyn; Hambleton, Ronald K. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 1993
Notes that the methods used to set standards for National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) tests suggest recommendations for state-level policymakers. Explains the national assessment, basic assumptions in setting performance standards on NAEP, selection of judges, standard-setting methodology for NAEP, and measurement issues in setting…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, National Norms, Standard Setting (Scoring), Standards
Peer reviewedSmith, Richard M.; Gross, Leon J. – Journal of Outcome Measurement, 1997
Five forms of a basic science examination administered over three years in a national board testing program were analyzed to determine the stability of judged cut scores. Results indicate that cut scores derived from the modified Nedelsky procedure were within equating error of the Rasch equated cut scores over the five administrations. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Equated Scores, Licensing Examinations (Professions), Science Tests
Xi, Xiaoming – ETS Research Report Series, 2008
Although the primary use of the speaking section of the Test of English as a Foreign Language™ Internet-based test (TOEFL® iBT Speaking test) is to inform admissions decisions at English medium universities, it may also be useful as an initial screening measure for international teaching assistants (ITAs). This study provides criterion-related…
Descriptors: Test Validity, Criterion Referenced Tests, English (Second Language), Language Tests
Peer reviewedLinn, Robert L. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1982
Confusion in the terminology used in criterion-referenced measurement specifications and development and standard setting and the attendant role of cut-off scores are shown to need practical clarification through psychometric research on test applications and consequences. (CM)
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Criterion Referenced Tests, Cutting Scores, Measurement Objectives
Peer reviewedCross, Lawrence H. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1985
Before using the National Teacher Examinations (NTE) for teacher certification, states are required to conduct a state-wide validity study. This paper describes approaches used in 35 studies for 18 states to establish (NTE) content validity through curriculum and job relatedness and to establish minimum performance standards. (BS)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Minimum Competency Testing, Standard Setting (Scoring), Standardized Tests
Peer reviewedLinn, Robert L.; Baker, Eva L. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1995
The implications of international assessments in setting world-class performance standards are explored. Possible uses of recent international assessments as benchmarks against which to compare the achievement of U.S. students are illustrated. Characteristics of international assessments that affect their usefulness as benchmarks are discussed.…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Benchmarking, Comparative Analysis, Cross Cultural Studies
Peer reviewedYen, Wendy M.; Ferrara, Steven – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1997
The program design and psychometric characteristics of the Maryland School Performance Assessment Program (MSPAP) are described, focusing on scaling, equating, standard setting, score accuracy, and validity. The MSPAP is an innovative performance-based testing program administered annually to students in grades three, five, and eight. (SLD)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Tests, Elementary Education, Grade 3
Peer reviewedDarling-Hammond, Linda – American Journal of Education, 1994
Argues that content standards that are aligned with tests are the wrong starting point for systemic school change aimed at improving teaching and learning and that national standards are the wrong vehicle. Policies should attempt to create a system in which community involvement, teacher knowledge, and equalized school capacity are starting points…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Access to Education, Community Responsibility, Community Role

Direct link
