Descriptor
| Readability Formulas | 2 |
| Reader Response | 2 |
| Audience Analysis | 1 |
| Discourse Analysis | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Literature Reviews | 1 |
| News Writing | 1 |
| Readability | 1 |
| Technical Writing | 1 |
| Writing Research | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedMcAdams, Katherine C. – Newspaper Research Journal, 1993
Investigates whether news stories that are easier to read will be more positively evaluated by readers. Finds no support for that hypothesis. Suggests that intriguing topics might attract and challenge all readers and potential readers because reader interest appears to be accompanied by a host of other positive reactions. (RS)
Descriptors: Higher Education, News Writing, Readability, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewedGiles, Timothy D. – Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 1990
Reviews recent articles focusing on the controversy surrounding the appropriateness of readability formulas for technical writing. Suggests that further research should be conducted to study empirically how readability as a concept might be used to aid the technical writer since readability formulas are shaping computerized editing programs. (KEH)
Descriptors: Audience Analysis, Discourse Analysis, Literature Reviews, Readability Formulas


