Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Infant Behavior | 25 |
| Research Problems | 25 |
| Infants | 21 |
| Research Methodology | 16 |
| Child Development | 9 |
| Measurement Techniques | 7 |
| Neonates | 7 |
| Models | 6 |
| Parent Child Relationship | 6 |
| Research | 6 |
| Testing Problems | 6 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Monographs of the Society for… | 8 |
| Child Development | 6 |
| Developmental Psychology | 5 |
| Journal of Experimental Child… | 3 |
| Cognition | 1 |
| Developmental Review | 1 |
| Psychological Review | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 25 |
| Opinion Papers | 12 |
| Reports - Research | 12 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 6 |
| Information Analyses | 2 |
| Reference Materials -… | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 2 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Brazelton Neonatal Assessment… | 6 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Adolph, Karen E.; Robinson, Scott R.; Young, Jesse W.; Gill-Alvarez, Felix – Psychological Review, 2008
Developmental trajectories provide the empirical foundation for theories about change processes during development. However, the ability to distinguish among alternative trajectories depends on how frequently observations are sampled. This study used real behavioral data, with real patterns of variability, to examine the effects of sampling at…
Descriptors: Intervals, Child Development, Sampling, Infant Behavior
Peer reviewedSolomon, C. Ruth – Child Development, 1980
In response to criticisms of a study conducted by Shaffran and Decarie, the author underscores the need for objective, accurate peer evaluation. Errors and misinterpretations in the critical article are reported and corrected. (Author/RH)
Descriptors: Infant Behavior, Research Methodology, Research Problems, Stranger Reactions
Peer reviewedSroufe, L. Alan – Child Development, 1980
Replies to Solomon's paper that basic criticisms made earlier of Shaffran and Decaries' study still apply. Views the study as essentially a confirmation of the null hypothesis based on weak measures. (Author/RH)
Descriptors: Infant Behavior, Research Methodology, Research Problems, Stranger Reactions
Peer reviewedLegerstee, Maria – Developmental Psychology, 2001
Maintains author's interpretation of 6-month-olds' behavior is consistent with task requirements in the 2000 study and previous work showing that infants use explanatory inferences to make sense of their world. Asserts that ability to understand that people communicate with persons but act on objects is precursor to infants' understanding at 9 to…
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Infant Behavior, Infants, Inferences
Peer reviewedJouen, Francois – Child Development, 1981
Analyzes methods used to record infant head position and the limits of these methods. An experimental device is proposed which records infant head turning and head righting when the vestibular system is stimulated. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Infant Behavior, Infants, Measurement Equipment, Motor Reactions
Peer reviewedAnisfeld, Moshe – Developmental Review, 1996
Examines nine studies claiming to have demonstrated facial imitation in the neonatal period. Finds that the claims of early imitative abilities are not well founded: because the matching behavior found is restricted to a single gesture--tongue protrusion--it is best explained as a specific, directly elicited response, rather than imitation. (HTH)
Descriptors: Facial Expressions, Imitation, Infant Behavior, Infants
Peer reviewedPoulson, Claire L.; Nunes, Leila R. P. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1988
Focuses on the experimental designs and methodology of 15 studies, most of which used only part of the methodology for the experimental analysis of behavior. Argues that the failure to fully use available research technology may have contributed to researchers' failure to make experimental contact with the definition of reinforcement. (RH)
Descriptors: Conditioning, Definitions, Infant Behavior, Reinforcement
Peer reviewedWynn, Karen – Child Development, 2000
Maintains that findings showing numerical computation abilities in infants are considerably more robust and consistent than Wakeley, Rivera, and Langer suggest. Asserts that all the interim replication attempts have successfully replicated Wynn's original findings. Discusses possible reasons for failure to replicate in Wakeley et al. experiments.…
Descriptors: Addition, Infant Behavior, Infants, Mathematics Skills
Peer reviewedPoulson, Claire L. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1984
Aims to clarify the distinction between elicitation and reinforcement discussed in Bloom (1984); to make explicit theoretical and methodological assumptions about the experimental analysis of infant behavior as shown in components of Poulson (1983); and to clarify differences in interpretation of other infant vocal conditioning research.…
Descriptors: Infant Behavior, Learning Theories, Operant Conditioning, Research Methodology
Peer reviewedRichters, John E.; And Others – Child Development, 1988
Multiple discriminant function analysis was conducted with data from Strange Situations. Results enable researchers to obtain attachment classifications directly from scores on interactive behavior and crying during reunion episodes. (PCB)
Descriptors: Attachment Behavior, Infant Behavior, Infants, Mothers
Peer reviewedBlass, Elliott M.; Ciaramitaro, Vivian – Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1994
Discusses two problems in the study by Blass and Ciaramitaro reported in this monograph: (1) whether the measurement of behavior states as "on-off" or "graded" captures a behavioral process or reflects the measurement itself; (2) whether the term "state" explains findings as a single function that may be better…
Descriptors: Infant Behavior, Infants, Mothers, Parent Child Relationship
Peer reviewedWakeley, Ann; Rivera, Susan; Langer, Jonas – Child Development, 2000
Asserts that findings on whether young infants look longer at incorrect addition and subtraction have been inconsistent or negative. Hypothesizes that imprecise ordinal calculating with very small numbers of objects develops in late infancy and that precise calculating develops in early childhood. (Author/KB)
Descriptors: Addition, Cognitive Development, Infant Behavior, Infants
Peer reviewedGergely, Gyorgy – Developmental Psychology, 2001
Suggests that the findings of Legerstee, Barna, and DiAdamo (2000) are most parsimoniously explained by associative learning and may not constitute a precursor to later understanding of intentionality. Argues for the importance of differentiating between associative and inferential processes and reviews evidence that the understanding of…
Descriptors: Association (Psychology), Associative Learning, Child Development, Cognitive Development
Peer reviewedJohnson, Scott P.; Bremner, J. Gavin; Slater, Alan M.; Mason, Uschi C.; Foster, Kirsty – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2002
A recognition-based paradigm was used to investigate possibility that past research failed to sensitively assess infants' perception of the unity of misaligned edges in partial occlusion displays. Results suggested that habituation designs tapping recognition processes may be particularly efficacious in revealing infants' perceptual organization.…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Fundamental Concepts, Habituation, Infant Behavior
Peer reviewedSostek, Anita Miller – Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1978
Descriptors: Annotated Bibliographies, Child Development, Infant Behavior, Infants
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2
Direct link
