NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gehring, Donald D.; Bracewell, William R. – New Directions for Student Services, 1992
Judicial decisions have set boundaries on the ability of educational institutions to write rules governing student conduct and have defined the necessary components of a fair procedure to be used to assess disciplinary sanctions. This legal evolution affirms the respect shown students as citizens of the academic community. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Behavior Standards, College Students, Discipline
Zirkel, Perry A. – Phi Delta Kappan, 1999
Parents whose learning-disabled son committed suicide after being suspended (without notice) sued the school district for violating the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and their 14th Amendment due-process rights. They won summary judgment on the IDEA claim, but lost the school liability claim. The case will be retried. (MLH)
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Court Litigation, Due Process, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Yell, Mitchell L. – Preventing School Failure, 1997
Reviews the 1997 amendments to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act in the context of the law's history. Focused on are changes in Individualized Education Program requirements, mediation as a conflict resolution option, discipline of students in special education, and the required review of the relationship between a student's…
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Conflict Resolution, Disabilities, Discipline
Comstock-Gay, Stuart – Wilson Library Bulletin, 1995
An explicit, nondiscriminatory code of conduct that is based on due process standards, and the enforcement of relevant laws can constitutionally address offensive behavior problems in libraries. (AEF)
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Behavior Standards, Constitutional Law, Due Process
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
King, Ashley Thomas – NASSP Bulletin, 1996
A survey of exclusionary discipline practices with handicapped students revealed a national pattern of "de facto" differential treatment. In denying a school's unilateral authority to remove dangerous or disruptive students, the Supreme Court's judgment in "Honig v. Doe" (1988) took precedence over all earlier court decisions.…
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Court Litigation, Disabilities, Due Process
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hirshoren, Alfred; Heller, Ginger G. – Journal of Special Education, 1979
Responses were obtained from all 50 states and three additional service units on a survey of programs for adolescents with behavioral disorders. (CL)
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Definitions, Due Process, Educational Trends
Fraser, Stephen R. – B. C. Journal of Special Education, 1987
Educational policy in British Columbia does not distinguish between special needs and regular class students in relation to discipline practices. Although Canadian courts have generally upheld the rights of school boards rather than the unspecified rights of special needs children, a recent court case suggests the possibility of change. (JW)
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, Behavior Problems, Board of Education Policy, Court Litigation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hustoles, Thomas P.; Duerr, Charles A., Jr. – CUPA Journal, 1994
This discussion of college and university policy concerning misconduct of employees looks at legal standards of due process for discipline or dismissal; the parameters of "just cause"; employee rights to representation; and judicial rulings on a variety of misconduct issues such as criminal misconduct, sexual misconduct, alcohol, and drugs. (MSE)
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Behavior Standards, Civil Rights, College Faculty