Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 11 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 34 |
Descriptor
| Difficulty Level | 44 |
| Test Items | 27 |
| Standard Setting (Scoring) | 25 |
| Cutting Scores | 21 |
| Standard Setting | 20 |
| Foreign Countries | 13 |
| Item Response Theory | 13 |
| Test Construction | 7 |
| Decision Making | 6 |
| Probability | 6 |
| Standards | 6 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Wyse, Adam E. | 4 |
| Plake, Barbara S. | 3 |
| Bichi, Ado Abdu | 2 |
| Clauser, Brian E. | 2 |
| Davis-Becker, Susan L. | 2 |
| Hein, Serge F. | 2 |
| Arce, Alvaro J. | 1 |
| Ascalon, M. Evelina | 1 |
| Aziz, Azrilah Abdul | 1 |
| Babcock, Ben | 1 |
| Beguin, Anton | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 44 |
| Reports - Research | 32 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 9 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - General | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 12 |
| Secondary Education | 11 |
| Postsecondary Education | 9 |
| High Schools | 4 |
| Grade 5 | 3 |
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
| Grade 3 | 2 |
| Grade 8 | 2 |
| Grade 10 | 1 |
| Grade 11 | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Advanced Placement… | 1 |
| Motivated Strategies for… | 1 |
| National Assessment of… | 1 |
| Progress in International… | 1 |
| Trends in International… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Tia M. Fechter; Heeyeon Yoon – Language Testing, 2024
This study evaluated the efficacy of two proposed methods in an operational standard-setting study conducted for a high-stakes language proficiency test of the U.S. government. The goal was to seek low-cost modifications to the existing Yes/No Angoff method to increase the validity and reliability of the recommended cut scores using a convergent…
Descriptors: Standard Setting, Language Proficiency, Language Tests, Evaluation Methods
Wyse, Adam E.; Babcock, Ben – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2020
A common belief is that the Bookmark method is a cognitively simpler standard-setting method than the modified Angoff method. However, a limited amount of research has investigated panelist's ability to perform well the Bookmark method, and whether some of the challenges panelists face with the Angoff method may also be present in the Bookmark…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Evaluation Methods, Testing Problems, Test Items
Dissabandara, Lakal O.; Nawaratna, Sujeevi; Nirthanan, Selvanayagam – Anatomical Sciences Education, 2023
The objective structured practical examination (OSPE) is a reliable assessment of practical skills in anatomy teaching. It is often administered as low-stake assessments to track progress at multiple time points in anatomy curricula. Standard-setting OSPEs to derive a pass mark and to ensure assessment quality and rigor is a complex task. This…
Descriptors: Standard Setting, Anatomy, Medical Education, Medical Schools
Clauser, Brian E.; Kane, Michael; Clauser, Jerome C. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2020
An Angoff standard setting study generally yields judgments on a number of items by a number of judges (who may or may not be nested in panels). Variability associated with judges (and possibly panels) contributes error to the resulting cut score. The variability associated with items plays a more complicated role. To the extent that the mean item…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Generalization, Decision Making, Standard Setting
Kara, Hakan; Cetin, Sevda – International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 2020
In this study, the efficiency of various random sampling methods to reduce the number of items rated by judges in an Angoff standard-setting study was examined and the methods were compared with each other. Firstly, the full-length test was formed by combining Placement Test 2012 and 2013 mathematics subsets. After then, simple random sampling…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Standard Setting (Scoring), Sampling, Error of Measurement
Bramley, Tom – Research Matters, 2020
The aim of this study was to compare, by simulation, the accuracy of mapping a cut-score from one test to another by expert judgement (using the Angoff method) versus the accuracy with a small-sample equating method (chained linear equating). As expected, the standard-setting method resulted in more accurate equating when we assumed a higher level…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Standard Setting (Scoring), Equated Scores, Accuracy
Thomas, Christopher L.; Cassady, Jerrell C.; Finch, W. Holmes – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2018
The purpose of the current examination was to preliminarily suggest severity standards for the recently revised Cognitive Test Anxiety Scale-Second Edition (CTAS-2). Participants responded to the CTAS-2, Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ), and FRIEDBEN Test Anxiety Scale. Using both latent class and cluster analyses, we were…
Descriptors: Cognitive Tests, Test Anxiety, Cutting Scores, Multivariate Analysis
Bichi, Ado Abdu; Talib, Rohaya; Embong, Rahimah; Mohamed, Hasnah Binti; Ismail, Mohd Sani; Ibrahim, Abdallah – Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2019
Purpose: University placement test is an important admission policy priority in Nigeria, because it serves as a university-based selection criterion for placement of students into undergraduate programs in Nigeria. Although recently attention have been shifted on the call to develop a standard content and standardize the test, yet attention has…
Descriptors: Standard Setting, Economics Education, Student Placement, Cutting Scores
Wyse, Adam E. – Applied Measurement in Education, 2018
This article discusses regression effects that are commonly observed in Angoff ratings where panelists tend to think that hard items are easier than they are and easy items are more difficult than they are in comparison to estimated item difficulties. Analyses of data from two credentialing exams illustrate these regression effects and the…
Descriptors: Regression (Statistics), Test Items, Difficulty Level, Licensing Examinations (Professions)
Moloi, Qetelo M.; Kanjee, Anil; Roberts, Nicky – Pythagoras, 2019
Within initial teacher education there is increasing pressure to enhance the use of assessment data to support students to improve their knowledge and skills, and to determine what standards they meet upon graduation. For such data to be useful, both programme designers and students require meaningful and comprehensive assessment reports on…
Descriptors: Preservice Teacher Education, Teacher Education Programs, Standard Setting, Mathematics Tests
Khatimin, Nuraini; Aziz, Azrilah Abdul; Zaharim, Azami; Yasin, Siti Hanani Mat – International Education Studies, 2013
Measurement and evaluation of students' achievement are an important aspect to make sure that students really understand the course content and monitor students' achievement level. Performance is not only reflected from the numbers of high achievers of the students, but also on quality of the grade obtained; does the grade "A" truly…
Descriptors: Standard Setting, Item Response Theory, Measurement Objectives, Measurement Techniques
Shulruf, Boaz; Jones, Phil; Turner, Rolf – Higher Education Studies, 2015
The determination of Pass/Fail decisions over Borderline grades, (i.e., grades which do not clearly distinguish between the competent and incompetent examinees) has been an ongoing challenge for academic institutions. This study utilises the Objective Borderline Method (OBM) to determine examinee ability and item difficulty, and from that…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Pass Fail Grading, Decision Making, Probability
Hodes, Carol L.; Kelley, Patricia L. – Athens Journal of Education, 2017
To address the skills gap and reward achievement, technical assessment publisher, NOCTI, began an initiative to define technical excellence in career technical education (CTE) programs and to recognize the nation's top CTE students through a digital Technical Badge of Excellence (TBOE). Analysis of standard setting methods and NOCTI student test…
Descriptors: Technical Assistance, Academic Achievement, Achievement Gap, Standard Setting
Hansen, Mary A.; Lyon, Steven R.; Heh, Peter; Zigmond, Naomi – Applied Measurement in Education, 2013
Large-scale assessment programs, including alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards (AA-AAS), must provide evidence of technical quality and validity. This study provides information about the technical quality of one AA-AAS by evaluating the standard setting for the science component. The assessment was designed to have…
Descriptors: Alternative Assessment, Science Tests, Standard Setting, Test Validity
Çetin, Sevda; Gelbal, Selahattin – Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 2013
In this research, the cut score of a foundation university was re-calculated with bookmark method and with Angoff method, each of which is a standard setting method; and the cut scores found were compared with the current proficiency score. Thus, the final cut score was found to be 27.87 with the cooperative work of 17 experts through the Angoff…
Descriptors: Standard Setting (Scoring), Comparative Analysis, Cutting Scores, Correlation

Peer reviewed
Direct link
