Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Computer Assisted Testing | 17 |
Individual Testing | 17 |
Adaptive Testing | 9 |
Item Response Theory | 5 |
Test Construction | 5 |
Test Items | 5 |
Diagnostic Tests | 3 |
Educational Testing | 3 |
Group Testing | 3 |
Testing | 3 |
Cheating | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 17 |
Reports - Descriptive | 9 |
Opinion Papers | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Intermediate Grades | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Researchers | 2 |
Location
Netherlands | 1 |
Pennsylvania | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Nelson, Peter M.; Van Norman, Ethan R.; Klingbeil, Dave A.; Parker, David C. – Psychology in the Schools, 2017
Although extensive research exists on the use of curriculum-based measures for progress monitoring, little is known about using computer adaptive tests (CATs) for progress-monitoring purposes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the frequency of data collection on individual and group growth estimates using a CAT. Data were…
Descriptors: Progress Monitoring, Computer Assisted Testing, Data Collection, Scheduling
Kolowich, Steve – Chronicle of Higher Education, 2013
Hailey Schnorr has spent years peering into the bedrooms, kitchens, and dorm rooms of students via Webcam. In her job proctoring online tests for universities, she has learned to focus mainly on students' eyes. Ms. Schnorr works for ProctorU, a company hired by universities to police the integrity of their online courses. ProctorU is part of a…
Descriptors: Online Courses, Computer Assisted Testing, Video Technology, Group Testing
Tendeiro, Jorge N.; Meijer, Rob R. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2012
This article extends the work by Armstrong and Shi on CUmulative SUM (CUSUM) person-fit methodology. The authors present new theoretical considerations concerning the use of CUSUM person-fit statistics based on likelihood ratios for the purpose of detecting cheating and random guessing by individual test takers. According to the Neyman-Pearson…
Descriptors: Cheating, Individual Testing, Adaptive Testing, Statistics
Freund, Philipp Alexander; Holling, Heinz – Intelligence, 2011
The interpretation of retest scores is problematic because they are potentially affected by measurement and predictive bias, which impact construct validity, and because their size differs as a function of various factors. This paper investigates the construct stability of scores on a figural matrices test and models retest effects at the level of…
Descriptors: Intelligence, Test Results, Individual Testing, Construct Validity
Brosvic, Gary M.; Epstein, Michael L.; Dihoff, Roberta E.; Cook, Michael L. – Psychological Record, 2006
The present studies were undertaken to examine the effects of manipulating delay-interval task (Study 1) and timing of feedback (Study 2) on acquisition and retention. Participants completed a 100-item cumulative final examination, which included 50 items from each laboratory examination, plus 50 entirely new items. Acquisition and retention were…
Descriptors: Individual Testing, Multiple Choice Tests, Feedback, Test Items

Trentin, Guglielmo – Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 1997
Computers can offer valuable assistance in the development and administration of personalized tests. This article provides an overview of different types of conventional and personalized tests and explores computerized adaptive testing. Also proposes a specific methodology for managing diagnostic adaptive tests and a hypertext system (HyperDelfi)…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Diagnostic Tests, Formative Evaluation
Jelden, D. L. – AEDS Monitor, 1982
Describes a procedure for using the computer to assist in evaluating the progress of students on pretests, unit tests, posttests or a combination of tests. The use of computers to evaluate cognitive objectives of a course is examined. Twenty-four references are listed. (MER)
Descriptors: Cognitive Tests, Computer Assisted Testing, Criterion Referenced Tests, Flow Charts

Bicanich, Eleanor; Slivinski, Thomas; Kapes, Jerome T.; Hardwicke, Susan B. – T.H.E. Journal, 1997
Reports on a statewide pilot project which compared testing using paper-and-pencil and Internet-delivered test items. Participants were students from 14 Pennsylvania vocational-technical institutions. Describes the structured use, what teachers should know and insight from the project. Demonstrates that the Internet offers a viable cost-effective…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Individual Testing, Internet, Nontraditional Education
Green, Bert F. – New Directions for Testing and Measurement, 1983
Computerized adaptive testing allows us to create a unique personalized test that matches the ability and knowledge of the test taker. (Author)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Individual Needs, Individual Testing

Smittle, Pat – Community College Journal, 1994
Discusses computerized adaptive testing, which is designed to provide students with an individualized examination adjusted to their skill levels. Indicates that scores are derived by comparing correct answers with the answers' difficulty rating. Highlights the advantages and disadvantages of the system and provides guidelines for successful…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Community Colleges, Computer Assisted Testing, Educational Testing

Lunz, Mary E.; Bergstrom, Betty A. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1994
The impact of computerized adaptive test (CAT) administration formats on student performance was studied with 645 medical technology students who also took a paper-and-pencil test. Analysis of covariance indicates no significant interactions among test administration formats and provides evidence for adjusting CAT test to more familiar modalities.…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Adaptive Testing, Analysis of Covariance, Computer Assisted Testing
Jacobson, Robert L. – Chronicle of Higher Education, 1993
The emergence of computerized adaptive tests (CATs), which customize assessment for each individual, may mean more efficient testing. A CAT version of the Graduate Record Examination is in production. Critics have many questions about the technique, which is based on item response theory. (MSE)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Educational Change, Higher Education, Individual Differences

Millman, Jason – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1984
In providing an alternative view to the previous article by Ward (TM 508 880), the author notes problems associated with adaptive testing, diagnostic testing, testing embedded in instruction, and testing through simulations. (BW)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Simulation, Computer Software
Evers, Linda – Popular Computing, 1983
Discusses the future of computerized adaptive testing (CAT), i.e., experimental tests developed by the Educational Testing Service in response to criticism of the Standardized Aptitude Tests (SATs). CAT examinations are individually tailored to each test taker, and researchers believe they are more predictive than conventional SATs. (JJD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, College Bound Students, College Entrance Examinations, Computer Assisted Testing

De Ayala, R. J. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1992
A computerized adaptive test (CAT) based on the nominal response model (NR CAT) was implemented, and the performance of the NR CAT and a CAT based on the three-parameter logistic model was compared. The NR CAT produced trait estimates comparable to those of the three-parameter test. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Equations (Mathematics)
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1 | 2