NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 9 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bon, Susan C.; Zirkel, Perry A. – Journal of Special Education Leadership, 2014
During the past two decades, scholars, educators, and special interest organizations, including advocacy groups, have critically examined and debated the ethical and legal use of aversive interventions with individuals with disabilities. These interventions comprise a broad spectrum of behavior management techniques including but not at all…
Descriptors: Timeout, Behavior Problems, Laws, School Law
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Adams, Peter J. – Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 2012
Practitioners who view intimate partner violence as a set of strategies aimed at maintaining positions of power and privilege often face an engagement dilemma when men at their first contact talk of themselves as disempowered by circumstances such as separation, loss of access to children, legal problems, substance abuse issues, and their own…
Descriptors: Legal Problems, Substance Abuse, Family Violence, Males
Longo, Julie; And Others – Education of the Visually Handicapped, 1981
The article reviews the use and limitations of medical and behavioral approaches (restraints, shock, drugs, punishment and aversive stimulation, reinforcement of incompatible behaviors, and overcorrection) to reduce self injury in visually impaired, mentally retarded persons. Legal and ethical considerations are pointed out. (Author/CL)
Descriptors: Behavior Modification, Ethics, Legal Problems, Mental Retardation
Barton, Lyle E.; And Others – Exceptional Education Quarterly, 1983
Litigation and the issues surrounding the use of behavioral procedures to handicapped persons are reviewed. Attention is directed to the use of aversive techniques, e.g., corporal punishment, electric shock, timeout, and restraint. (SEW)
Descriptors: Behavior Modification, Civil Rights, Court Litigation, Disabilities
Konarski, Edward A., Jr. – American Journal on Mental Retardation, 1990
In response to James Mulick (EC 232 032), this paper agrees with the need for careful use of aversive techniques to treat severe behavior disorders of persons who are mentally retarded but justifies such use on moral, legal, ethical, and practical bases as well as scientific ones. (DB)
Descriptors: Behavior Disorders, Behavior Modification, Behavioral Sciences, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Paley, Blair; O'Connor, Mary J. – Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 2009
Exposure to alcohol in utero is considered to be the leading cause of developmental disabilities of known etiology. The most severe consequence of such exposure, fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS), is characterized by a distinct constellation of characteristic facial anomalies, growth retardation, and central nervous system (CNS) dysfunction. Some…
Descriptors: Developmental Disabilities, Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, Etiology, Anatomy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Eberlein, Larry – Clearing House, 1980
The author explores the growing litigation over student rights in disciplinary cases, noting that the teacher's freedom to use punishment and behavior modification is being restricted. He presents teachers with some guidelines on classroom management and control in light of these court rulings. (SJL)
Descriptors: Behavior Modification, Classroom Techniques, Corporal Punishment, Court Litigation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kemp, Fred – Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 1996
Addresses the debate over aversive versus nonaversive treatment for preschool children with severe behavior disorders. Discusses problematic aspects of an ideological approach to behavior disorder treatment; relative intrusiveness of psychoactive medications; alternatives to legal actions against school districts; side effects; therapeutic effects…
Descriptors: Behavior Disorders, Behavior Modification, Behavior Problems, Caregivers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rozalski, Michael E.; Yell, Mitchell L.; Boreson, Lynn A. – Journal of Special Education Leadership, 2006
Seclusion timeout and physical restraint are aversive procedures designed to reduce or eliminate students' serious problem behavior. Using these procedures with students in special education has become commonplace in the last decade. Nevertheless, both seclusion timeout and physical restraint procedures have been, and continue to be, quite…
Descriptors: Legal Problems, Student Behavior, Civil Rights, Hearings