Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Adaptive Testing | 4 |
| Predictive Measurement | 4 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 3 |
| Academic Ability | 1 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Algebra | 1 |
| At Risk Students | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Comparative Testing | 1 |
| Data Collection | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Applied Psychological… | 1 |
| Educational and Psychological… | 1 |
| Journal of Education for… | 1 |
| Journal of Educational… | 1 |
Author
| Choi, Seung W. | 1 |
| Dodd, Barbara G. | 1 |
| Emily R. Forcht | 1 |
| Ethan R. Van Norman | 1 |
| Grady, Matthew W. | 1 |
| Loken, Eric | 1 |
| Rulison, Kelly L. | 1 |
| Wainer, Howard | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 4 | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| Grade 8 | 1 |
| Intermediate Grades | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ethan R. Van Norman; Emily R. Forcht – Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 2024
This study evaluated the forecasting accuracy of trend estimation methods applied to time-series data from computer adaptive tests (CATs). Data were collected roughly once a month over the course of a school year. We evaluated the forecasting accuracy of two regression-based growth estimation methods (ordinary least squares and Theil-Sen). The…
Descriptors: Data Collection, Predictive Measurement, Predictive Validity, Predictor Variables
Choi, Seung W.; Grady, Matthew W.; Dodd, Barbara G. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2011
The goal of the current study was to introduce a new stopping rule for computerized adaptive testing (CAT). The predicted standard error reduction (PSER) stopping rule uses the predictive posterior variance to determine the reduction in standard error that would result from the administration of additional items. The performance of the PSER was…
Descriptors: Item Banks, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Evaluation Methods
Rulison, Kelly L.; Loken, Eric – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2009
A difficult result to interpret in Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) occurs when an ability estimate initially drops and then ascends continuously until the test ends, suggesting that the true ability may be higher than implied by the final estimate. This study explains why this asymmetry occurs and shows that early mistakes by high-ability…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Item Response Theory, Academic Ability
Peer reviewedWainer, Howard; And Others – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1991
Hierarchical (adaptive) and linear methods of testlet construction were compared. The performance of 2,080 ninth and tenth graders on a 4-item testlet was used to predict performance on the entire test. The adaptive test was slightly superior as a predictor, but the cost of obtaining that superiority was considerable. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Algebra, Comparative Testing, High School Students

Direct link
