NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20260
Since 20250
Since 2022 (last 5 years)0
Since 2017 (last 10 years)1
Since 2007 (last 20 years)5
Education Level
Higher Education1
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 12 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jimenez-Arista, Laura E.; Holzapfel, Jennifer; Shanholtz, Caroline E.; Tracey, Terence J. G. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2020
We examined the validity of the Shorter Psychotherapy and Counseling Evaluation (Halstead, Leach, & Rust, 2007). Results supported incremental predictive validity (up to 12%) over the Outcome Questionnaire--10.2 (OQ-10.2), predictive validity with the Outcome Questionnaire--45 and the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems--32, and convergent…
Descriptors: Outcomes of Treatment, Psychotherapy, Measures (Individuals), Predictive Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wright, Aidan G. C.; Pincus, Aaron L.; Hopwood, Christopher J.; Thomas, Katherine M.; Markon, Kristian E.; Krueger, Robert F. – Assessment, 2012
The proposed changes to the personality disorder section of the "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders" (5th ed.) places an increased focus on interpersonal impairment as one of the defining features of personality psychopathology. In addition, a proposed trait model has been offered to provide a means of capturing…
Descriptors: Personality Traits, Personality Problems, Psychopathology, Interpersonal Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kemper, Christoph J.; Lutz, Johannes; Bahr, Tobias; Ruddel, Heinz; Hock, Michael – Assessment, 2012
Using two clinical samples of patients, the presented studies examined the construct validity of the recently revised Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 (ASI-3). Confirmatory factor analyses established a clear three-factor structure that corresponds to the postulated subdivision of the construct into correlated somatic, social, and cognitive components.…
Descriptors: Construct Validity, Reliability, Anxiety, Measures (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hess, Timothy R.; Rohlfing, Jessica E.; Hardy, Amanda O.; Glidden-Tracey, Cynthia; Tracey, Terence J. G. – Assessment, 2010
This study examined whether the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ) and its subscales assessed unique interpersonal distress. The Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP) was used to assess discriminant validity for unique interpersonal distress. Participants (N = 121) were recruited from a southwestern university counselor training center. Significant…
Descriptors: Questionnaires, Interpersonal Relationship, Psychological Patterns, Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hatcher, Robert L.; Rogers, Daniel T. – Psychological Assessment, 2009
An Inventory of Interpersonal Strengths (IIS) was developed and validated in a series of large college student samples. Based on interpersonal theory and associated methods, the IIS was designed to assess positive characteristics representing the full range of interpersonal domains, including those generally thought to have negative qualities…
Descriptors: Life Satisfaction, Validity, Interpersonal Competence, Measures (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hill, Robert W.; Zrull, Mark C.; McIntire, Karen – Assessment, 1998
Findings from 214 pairs of undergraduates support the validity of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-Circumplex (L. Alden, J. Wiggins, and A. Pincus, 1990) and describe discrepancies in self- versus peer-reported interpersonal problems. Results also describe differences in the general interpersonal distress factor accounted for by ipsatizing…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Interpersonal Relationship, Peer Evaluation, Self Evaluation (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Monsen, Jon T.; Hagtvet, Knut A.; Havik, Odd E.; Eilertsen, Dag E. – Psychological Assessment, 2006
This study assessed the construct validity of the circumplex model of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP-C) in Norwegian clinical and nonclinical samples. Structure was examined by evaluating the fit of the circumplex model to data obtained by the IIP-C. Observer-rated personality disorder criteria (DSM-IV, Axis II) were used as external…
Descriptors: Personality Problems, Correlation, Interpersonal Relationship, Construct Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gurtman, Michael B. – Psychological Assessment, 1996
The construct validity of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP) was studied. The IIP was used to categorize 104 patients reporting interpersonal distress into 4 problem quadrants. Results offer broad support for the convergent validity of the IIP and offer knowledge about interpersonal problems and the psychotherapy context. (SLD)
Descriptors: Classification, Construct Validity, Emotional Problems, Interpersonal Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cahill, Jane; Barkham, Michael; Stiles, William B.; Twigg, Elspeth; Hardy, Gillian E.; Rees, Anne; Evans, Chris – Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2006
Clients (N = 77) undergoing cognitive therapy for depression were assessed before treatment with the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM), which encompasses domains of subjective well-being, problems, functioning, and risk of harming self or others, along with the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDIII), the Hamilton…
Descriptors: Validity, Measures (Individuals), Depression (Psychology), Cognitive Restructuring
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kellett, Stephen; Beail, Nigel; Newman, David W. – American Journal on Mental Retardation, 2005
Despite interpersonal problems being commonplace in the clinical presentations of people with mental retardation, previous efforts to index interpersonal difficulties have tended to unsatisfactorily rely on external ratings. The Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-32 is a psychometrically robust self-report measure of interpersonal problems in…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, Mild Mental Retardation, Interpersonal Relationship, Interpersonal Competence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Slaney, Robert B.; Pincus, Aaron L.; Uliaszek, Amanda A.; Wang, Kenneth T. – Assessment, 2006
This study examined two conceptions of perfectionism in relation to interpersonal problems. Two hundred and seventy-nine undergraduate participants completed the Almost Perfect Scale-Revised (APS-R) and the Dyadic Almost Perfect Scale (DAPS). The authors used empirically derived discriminant functions (APS-R) and cluster analysis (DAPS) to…
Descriptors: Interpersonal Relationship, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Profiles
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Horowitz, Leonard M.; And Others – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1988
Describes Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP), new measure designed to identify the types of interpersonal problems that people experience and the level of distress associated with them before, during, and after psychotherapy. Presents psychometric data from two studies which demonstrated high internal consistency of IIP, high test-retest…
Descriptors: Assertiveness, Interpersonal Competence, Interpersonal Relationship, Intimacy