Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Scoring Formulas | 2 |
| Test Construction | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Error Patterns | 1 |
| Guessing (Tests) | 1 |
| Guidelines | 1 |
| Item Analysis | 1 |
| Item Response Theory | 1 |
| Literature Reviews | 1 |
| Multiple Choice Tests | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Information Analyses | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Gierl, Mark J.; Bulut, Okan; Guo, Qi; Zhang, Xinxin – Review of Educational Research, 2017
Multiple-choice testing is considered one of the most effective and enduring forms of educational assessment that remains in practice today. This study presents a comprehensive review of the literature on multiple-choice testing in education focused, specifically, on the development, analysis, and use of the incorrect options, which are also…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Difficulty Level, Accuracy, Error Patterns
Love, Gayle A. – 1987
In a review of relevant literature, it is argued that correction for guessing formulas should not be used. It is contended that such formulas correct for guessing that does not really exist in a noticeable amount, penalize those students who have low self-esteem and self-confidence, correct for errors that are not necessarily errors, benefit risk…
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Scoring Formulas, Self Esteem, Teacher Made Tests

Peer reviewed
Direct link
