Descriptor
| Effect Size | 2 |
| Error of Measurement | 2 |
| Hypothesis Testing | 2 |
| Statistical Significance | 2 |
| Analysis of Variance | 1 |
| Data Interpretation | 1 |
| Editors | 1 |
| Literature Reviews | 1 |
| Probability | 1 |
| Reliability | 1 |
| Research Design | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Publication Type
| Information Analyses | 2 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. – 2001
D. Robinson and J. Levin (1997) proposed what they called a two-step procedure for analyzing statistical data in which researchers first evaluate the probability of an observed effect statistically (i.e., statistical significance), and, if and only if, it can be concluded that the underlying finding is too improbable to be due to chance, then they…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Error of Measurement, Hypothesis Testing, Probability
Thompson, Bruce – 1987
This paper evaluates the logic underlying various criticisms of statistical significance testing and makes specific recommendations for scientific and editorial practice that might better increase the knowledge base. Reliance on the traditional hypothesis testing model has led to a major bias against nonsignificant results and to misinterpretation…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Data Interpretation, Editors, Effect Size


