Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Publication Type
| Information Analyses | 7 |
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 4 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| New Zealand | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedBerk, Ronald A. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1995
A brief summary of standard setting knowledge is presented, derived from about 20 methods that utilize a judgmental review process, the approach most relevant to the standard-setting strategies proposed in this special issue. Criteria for judging effectiveness and critiques of the methods discussed in the issue are offered. (SLD)
Descriptors: Criteria, Decision Making, Educational History, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedMills, Craig N. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1995
The articles of this special issue propose two methods of deriving an initial standard and one method for determining the extent to which the standard should include compensation. Much work remains to be done on further development of the methods and the larger issues of policy regarding performance assessment. (SLD)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Educational Policy, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators
Roberts, Peter – International Review of Education, 2007
This paper provides a critical analysis of New Zealand's Performance Based Research Fund (PBRF). The first section sketches the development and implementation of the PBRF. The second section evaluates the scheme, concentrating on three themes: the relationship between privatization, competition and research performance; the standardization of…
Descriptors: Postsecondary Education, Foreign Countries, Privatization, Policy Analysis
Peer reviewedPlake, Barbara S. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1995
The three standard-setting approaches described in this special issue are summarized and contrasted: (1) judgmental policy capturing; (2) the extended Angoff method; and (3) the dominant profile method. An integrative summary of findings is followed by recommendations for modifying the methods. (SLD)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators
Peer reviewedPlake, Barbara S. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1995
This article provides a framework for the rest of the articles in this special issue comparing the utility of three standard-setting methods with complex performance assessments. The context of the standard setting study is described, and the methods are outlined. (SLD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Criteria, Decision Making, Educational Assessment
Hambleton, Ronald K. – 1995
Performance assessments in education and credentialing are becoming popular. At the same time, there do not exist any well established and validated methods for setting standards on performance assessments. This paper describes several of the new standard-setting methods that are emerging for use with performance assessments and considers their…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Cutting Scores, Holistic Evaluation, Licensing Examinations (Professions)
Hambleton, Ronald K. – 1993
A review of educational measurement journals indicates that the decade of the 1970s and up until about 1984 was the time when substantial numbers of studies dealt with criterion-referenced measurement, and the era in which criterion-referenced measurement advances were made. Although there appears to be less interest in publications today, a…
Descriptors: Content Validity, Criterion Referenced Tests, Decision Making, Diagnostic Tests

Direct link
