Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Author
| Bagarukayo, Emily | 1 |
| Baguma, Rehema | 1 |
| Brown, Cheryl | 1 |
| Chen, Teresa | 1 |
| Hsu, Hui-Mei | 1 |
| Mayisela, Tabisa | 1 |
| Namubiru, Proscovia | 1 |
| Schrage, John F. | 1 |
| Stamm, Sheila Wright | 1 |
| Yeh, Ronnie | 1 |
Publication Type
| Information Analyses | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Uganda | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textBaguma, Rehema; Bagarukayo, Emily; Namubiru, Proscovia; Brown, Cheryl; Mayisela, Tabisa – International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 2019
Most universities in Uganda encourage memorization as the predominant method of learning. This has been partly linked to limited practical pedagogical skills among educators, to effectively engage students to develop Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). Consequently, students are not well prepared for the world after university. WhatsApp Enabled…
Descriptors: Computer Oriented Programs, Thinking Skills, Social Theories, Foreign Countries
Direct linkChen, Teresa; Hsu, Hui-Mei; Stamm, Sheila Wright; Yeh, Ronnie – E-Learning and Digital Media, 2019
The purpose of this study was to identify salient features for a critical thinking app and create an instrument to facilitate the app evaluation and selection process. Two questions guided the study: (1) What distinguishes critical thinking instructional apps from others? and (2) What design principles are essential to develop a critical thinking…
Descriptors: College Students, Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Critical Thinking
Schrage, John F. – 1997
Based on literature and student input, six major concerns have been noted for student programming progress for the academic class and work environment. The areas of concern are module driver programming, program documentation, output design, data design, data validation; and reusable code. Each area has been analyzed and examined in the teaching…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Computer Oriented Programs, Computer Science Education, Computer Software Development
