Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Literature Reviews | 2 |
| Test Validity | 2 |
| Children | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Meta Analysis | 1 |
| Reading Comprehension | 1 |
| Reading Skills | 1 |
| Reading Tests | 1 |
| Technological Literacy | 1 |
| Test Reliability | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| SAGE Open | 2 |
Author
| Emily Wood | 1 |
| Kereisha Biggs | 1 |
| Monika Molnar | 1 |
| Novoa-Hernández, Pavel | 1 |
| Saltos-Rivas, Rafael | 1 |
| Serrano Rodríguez, Rocío | 1 |
Publication Type
| Information Analyses | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Emily Wood; Kereisha Biggs; Monika Molnar – SAGE Open, 2024
Dynamic assessments (DAs) of word reading skills demonstrate strong criterion reference validity with word reading measures (WRMs). However, DAs vary in the skills they assess, their format and administration method, and the type of words and symbols used in test items. These characteristics may have implications on assessment validity. To compare…
Descriptors: Literature Reviews, Meta Analysis, Reading Tests, Reading Comprehension
Saltos-Rivas, Rafael; Novoa-Hernández, Pavel; Serrano Rodríguez, Rocío – SAGE Open, 2022
Evaluating digital competencies has become a topic of growing interest in recent years. Although several reviews and studies have summarized the main elements of progress and shortcomings in this area, some issues are yet to be explored. Very little information is available about the ways of ensuring the validity and reliability of the instrument…
Descriptors: Test Reliability, Test Validity, Evaluation Methods, Technological Literacy

Peer reviewed
Direct link
