Descriptor
| Evaluation | 2 |
| Evaluators | 2 |
| Information Utilization | 2 |
| Research Utilization | 2 |
| Audiences | 1 |
| Communication (Thought… | 1 |
| Credibility | 1 |
| Legislators | 1 |
| Policy Formation | 1 |
| Program Evaluation | 1 |
| Research Reports | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| New Directions for Program… | 2 |
Author
| Brandl, John E. | 1 |
| Newman, Dianna L. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Information Analyses | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedNewman, Dianna L.; And Others – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1980
The process of reporting evaluation results is described in terms of communications theory. Results of several simulated studies of factors which influence the credibility of evaluators and reports are summarized, and implications are discussed. (Available from: Jossey-Bass, Inc., 433 California St., San Francisco, CA 94104, single issue, $6.95.)…
Descriptors: Audiences, Communication (Thought Transfer), Credibility, Evaluation
Peer reviewedBrandl, John E. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1980
To better understand policy formation, evaluators should be aware of the perspectives from which legislators view evaluators. Illustrations of the impact of evaluation and research projects on policy are provided. (Available from: Jossey-Bass, Inc., 433 California St., San Francisco, CA 94104, single issue, $6.95.) (Author/GDC)
Descriptors: Evaluation, Evaluators, Information Utilization, Legislators
