Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
| Learning Disability Quarterly | 3 |
Author
| Compton, Donald L. | 1 |
| Crump, W. Donald | 1 |
| Fuchs, Douglas | 1 |
| Fuchs, Lynn S. | 1 |
| Kaldenberg, Erica R. | 1 |
| Simms, Rochelle B. | 1 |
| Therrien, William J. | 1 |
| Watt, Sarah J. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Information Analyses | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| Grade 2 | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Kaldenberg, Erica R.; Watt, Sarah J.; Therrien, William J. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2015
As a growing number of students with learning disabilities (LD) receive science instruction in general education settings, students with LD continue to perform significantly lower than their non-disabled peers. The shift from textbook-driven instruction to inquiry-based approaches to science learning supports students who struggle with reading.…
Descriptors: Reading Instruction, Science Instruction, Learning Disabilities, Reading Difficulties
Fuchs, Douglas; Fuchs, Lynn S.; Compton, Donald L. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2004
This article first describes two types of assessment (problem solving and standard treatment protocol) within a "responsiveness-to-instruction" framework to identify learning disabilities. It then specifies two necessary components (measures and classification criteria) to assess responsiveness-to-instruction, and present pertinent findings from…
Descriptors: Identification, Problem Solving, Grade 1, Reading Difficulties
Peer reviewedSimms, Rochelle B.; Crump, W. Donald – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1983
Syntactic development in the oral language of learning disabled and normal students at two intermediate and two secondary-school age levels was compared using two indices, the T-unit and the Syntactic Density Score. It was concluded that no single, sensitive, numerical index exists to quantify syntactic development. (SW)
Descriptors: Age Groups, Clinical Diagnosis, Comparative Analysis, Disability Identification

Direct link
