Descriptor
Research Problems | 4 |
Intelligence | 3 |
Research Methodology | 3 |
Cognitive Processes | 2 |
Intelligence Quotient | 2 |
Ability | 1 |
Age Differences | 1 |
Cognitive Ability | 1 |
Control Groups | 1 |
Criticism | 1 |
Data Interpretation | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Intelligence | 4 |
Publication Type
Information Analyses | 4 |
Journal Articles | 4 |
Collected Works - General | 1 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Longstreth, Langdon E. – Intelligence, 1984
Jensen has reported reaction-time (RT) studies indicating that various parameters correlate significantly with IQ. Two parameters of interest are slope of RT across set size and increasing correlations of RT with IQ as set size increases. After reviewing these studies, the author concludes that Jensen's claims are unwarranted. (Author/BW)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Intelligence, Reaction Time, Research Methodology

McCall, Robert B. – Intelligence, 1981
Studies reporting predictions from assessments of infant recognition memory to later developmental performance and IQ are critiqued. Inelegancies in design, procedure, and analyses are noted. While this approach may have potential, its utility for practical or clinical purposes is still not demonstrated. (Author/RD)
Descriptors: Developmental Psychology, Infants, Intellectual Development, Intelligence

Jarman, Ronald F. – Intelligence, 1980
A critique by Carroll of a study by Jarman and Das (EJ 171 820) is refuted in terms of the methodology and theory of the Jarman and Das study. Additionally, two general issues concerned with individual differences in cognitive processes and strategic behavior are elaborated beyond Carroll's discussion. (Author/CP)
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Processes, Factor Analysis, Individual Differences

Spitz, Herman H.; And Others – Intelligence, 1993
H.H. Spitz argues that interesting results from the preschool intervention of the Abecedarian Project continue to be disregarded. C.T. Ramey reiterates his earlier objections to Spitz's conclusions, and H.H. Spitz rejoins with specific objections to Ramey. (SLD)
Descriptors: Ability, Age Differences, Control Groups, Criticism