Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Test Format | 4 |
| Multiple Choice Tests | 3 |
| Test Construction | 3 |
| Difficulty Level | 2 |
| Educational Research | 2 |
| Responses | 2 |
| Test Items | 2 |
| Test Use | 2 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational Measurement:… | 4 |
Author
| Albanese, Mark A. | 1 |
| Dosedel, Michael | 1 |
| Downing, Steven M. | 1 |
| Frisbie, David A. | 1 |
| Ihlenfeldt, Samuel D. | 1 |
| Riegelman, Amy | 1 |
| Rios, Joseph A. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Information Analyses | 4 |
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Rios, Joseph A.; Ihlenfeldt, Samuel D.; Dosedel, Michael; Riegelman, Amy – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2020
This systematic review investigated the topics studied and reporting practices of published meta-analyses in educational measurement. Our findings indicated that meta-analysis is not a highly utilized methodological tool in educational measurement; on average, less than one meta-analysis has been published per year over the past 30 years (28…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Educational Assessment, Test Format, Testing Accommodations
Peer reviewedAlbanese, Mark A. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1993
A comprehensive review is given of evidence, with a bearing on the recommendation to avoid use of complex multiple choice (CMC) items. Avoiding Type K items (four primary responses and five secondary choices) seems warranted, but evidence against CMC in general is less clear. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cues, Difficulty Level, Multiple Choice Tests, Responses
Peer reviewedDowning, Steven M. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1992
Research on true-false (TF), multiple-choice, and alternate-choice (AC) tests is reviewed, discussing strengths, weaknesses, and the usefulness in classroom and large-scale testing of each. Recommendations are made for improving use of AC items to overcome some of the problems associated with TF items. (SLD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Educational Research, Multiple Choice Tests, Objective Tests
Peer reviewedFrisbie, David A. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1992
Literature related to the multiple true-false (MTF) item format is reviewed. Each answer cluster of a MTF item may have several true items and the correctness of each is judged independently. MTF tests appear efficient and reliable, although they are a bit harder than multiple choice items for examinees. (SLD)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Difficulty Level, Literature Reviews, Multiple Choice Tests

Direct link
