Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 3 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 7 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Ahmed, Susan | 1 |
| Baer, John | 1 |
| Baer, Sylvia | 1 |
| Berube, Jean E. | 1 |
| Choltco-Devlin, Beverly | 1 |
| Dalgleish, Len | 1 |
| Friedman, Herbert | 1 |
| Goodwin, Laura D. | 1 |
| Goodwin, William L. | 1 |
| Gross, Melissa | 1 |
| Hsu, Louis M. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 21 |
| Journal Articles | 11 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Books | 1 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 4 |
| Practitioners | 2 |
| Counselors | 1 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Lenz, A. Stephen – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 2020
A guide for professional counselors and counseling researchers for calculating and interpreting Percent Improvement as an indicator of clinical significance is provided. Strategies for reporting findings are described and illustrated. Guidelines for contextualizing discussions of clinical significance within the boundaries of psychometric evidence…
Descriptors: Counseling, Research, Computation, Improvement
What Works Clearinghouse, 2020
The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) is an initiative of the U.S. Department of Education's Institute of Education Sciences (IES), which was established under the Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002. It is an important part of IES's strategy to use rigorous and relevant research, evaluation, and statistics to improve the nation's education system.…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Evaluation Methods, Evidence, Statistical Significance
What Works Clearinghouse, 2017
The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) systematic review process is the basis of many of its products, enabling the WWC to use consistent, objective, and transparent standards and procedures in its reviews, while also ensuring comprehensive coverage of the relevant literature. The WWC systematic review process consists of five steps: (1) Developing…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Evaluation Methods, Evidence, Statistical Significance
What Works Clearinghouse, 2014
This "What Works Clearinghouse Procedures and Standards Handbook (Version 3.0)" provides a detailed description of the standards and procedures of the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC). The remaining chapters of this Handbook are organized to take the reader through the basic steps that the WWC uses to develop a review protocol, identify…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Guides, Intervention, Classification
What Works Clearinghouse, 2008
This handbook describes the structure and processes that the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) uses for its reviews, presenting in one place all the standards the WWC currently uses to assess research. The handbook will be revised as new standards are developed and major new features are finalized. A distinguishing feature of the WWC is that it does…
Descriptors: Guides, Standards, Educational Research, Evaluation
What Works Clearinghouse, 2011
With its critical assessments of scientific evidence on the effectiveness of education programs, policies, and practices (referred to as "interventions"), and a range of products summarizing this evidence, the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) is an important part of the Institute of Education Sciences' strategy to use rigorous and relevant…
Descriptors: Standards, Access to Information, Information Management, Guides
Rosenthal, James A. – Springer, 2011
Written by a social worker for social work students, this is a nuts and bolts guide to statistics that presents complex calculations and concepts in clear, easy-to-understand language. It includes numerous examples, data sets, and issues that students will encounter in social work practice. The first section introduces basic concepts and terms to…
Descriptors: Statistics, Data Interpretation, Social Work, Social Science Research
Peer reviewedFriedman, Herbert – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1982
A concise table is presented based on a general measure of magnitude of effect which allows direct determinations of statistical power over a practical range of values and alpha levels. The table also facilitates the setting of the research sample size needed to provide a given degree of power. (Author/CM)
Descriptors: Hypothesis Testing, Power (Statistics), Research Design, Sampling
Peer reviewedMarkel, William D. – School Science and Mathematics, 1985
The concept of statistical significance is explained, with specific numerical illustrations. (MNS)
Descriptors: Educational Research, Mathematical Concepts, Probability, Research Methodology
Peer reviewedShine, Lester C. II – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1980
When reporting results, researchers must not change predetermined significance levels. Such attempts to make results more significant are statistically inaccurate, illogical, and unethical. American Psychological Association standards for reporting significance should be more explicit. (CP)
Descriptors: Ethics, Hypothesis Testing, Research Design, Research Reports
Baer, John; Baer, Sylvia – Gifted Child Today (GCT), 1988
The dangers of equating "statistical significance" with "real world" significance are summarized. When a finding is said to have "statistical significance," it means only that the same results would be likely to occur again if the study were repeated, not that the finding has any true personal or societal importance. (VW)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Research Methodology, Research Problems, Statistical Significance
Peer reviewedSchwartz, Steven; Dalgleish, Len – Journal of Research in Personality, 1982
Statistical significance is not a sufficient condition for claiming a hypothesis has been supported. Constructive replications are more important. Statistically significant results may be meaningless while a sequence of nonsignificant results may be quite important. Gives advice on how to overcome some limitations of classifical statistical…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Data Analysis, Personality Studies, Research Methodology
PDF pending restorationKershner, Keith – 1978
Designed for use with Research for Better Schools' evaluation system, this guide focuses upon basic concepts and statistical procedures applicable to specific research hypotheses emerging from evaluation questions. The first of three sections presents a discussion of descriptive statistics in terms of frequency, central tendency, variability, and…
Descriptors: Career Education, Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Guides
Peer reviewedLittle, Joseph – Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 2001
Considers how if literacy is envisioned as a sort of competence in a set of social and intellectual practices, then scientific literacy must encompass the realization that "statistical significance," the cardinal arbiter of social scientific knowledge, was not born out of an immanent logic of mathematics but socially constructed and…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Interpersonal Relationship, Literacy, Research Methodology
Peer reviewedGoodwin, Laura D.; Goodwin, William L. – Journal of Early Intervention, 1989
This article explains and illustrates the estimation of the power of statistical tests used to analyze data in early childhood special education research, and discusses advantages and disadvantages of various ways to increase power, such as using a directional alternate hypothesis or using a parametric, rather than nonparametric, statistical test.…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Early Childhood Education, Educational Research, Hypothesis Testing
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1 | 2
Direct link
