NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Mannering, Linda W.; McKinney, Richard L. – 1983
The paper sets the stage for the effective and efficient use of computers in institutional research. The microcomputer and the mainframe computer are contrasted for those researchers who have a choice of where to process data. General computer use, specific microcomputer and mainframe computing guidelines, and an application utilizing both…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computers, Data Analysis, Data Processing
Coonce, Leland H. – CAUSE/EFFECT, 1979
Alternatives to the normal detail bid specifications usually required for public institutions of higher education to purchase computer software are examined. It is suggested that the request for proposal method described offers the consumer a better understanding of individual software vendors' products. (Author/SF)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Software, Computers, Consumer Education
DeFranco, Randall W. – College Planning & Management, 2002
Discusses why, when preparing a Request for Proposal (RFP) for Facilities Condition Audit (FCA)--including software-based delivery of findings--facilities managers should avoid complicating the bidding process with nondescript data-linking requirements. Presents ways to get an apples-to-apples comparison of bids for a proposed FCA project and…
Descriptors: Audits (Verification), Bids, Comparative Analysis, Computer Software
Hart, Robert S. – 1994
This guide to ERRATA, a set of HyperCard-based tools for response analysis and error diagnosis in language testing, is intended as a user manual and general reference and designed to be used with the software (not included here). It has three parts. The first is a brief survey of computational techniques available for dealing with student test…
Descriptors: Authoring Aids (Programming), Comparative Analysis, Computer Software, Data Processing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McLaughlin, Josetta S.; McLaughlin, Gerald W. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1995
Concerns about published comparisons of colleges and universities are organized into a framework to guide further research. A systematic method for addressing specific issues about the guides is presented, and the environment in which the guides are used is examined. Research needed to assure that the guides make a valued contribution and are fair…
Descriptors: College Administration, College Choice, Comparative Analysis, Data Processing