NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Diamantes, Thomas; Collins, Susan R. – Reading Improvement, 2000
Surveys 20 elementary school administrators. Finds they: do not share the same definition of reading, and differ in their perception of which aspects of reading are most important; agreed that teachers and central office personnel established goals for reading programs, and seek advice from teachers and reading supervisors; and felt they best…
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Elementary Education, Instructional Effectiveness, Principals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Blair, Susan M. – Reading Improvement, 1988
Surveys educators from Ireland, the United Kingdom, and the United States concerning their perceptions of inservice education at the local level. Concludes that teachers are dissatisfied with all facets of inservice training. (MM)
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Inservice Teacher Education, Program Effectiveness, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lickteig, Mary J.; Russell, Jill F. – Reading Improvement, 1993
Presents survey results of 183 teachers in 13 elementary schools regarding read-aloud practices, stated benefits of reading aloud, favorite titles selected for reading aloud (grades k-6), and recommendations for planning read-aloud sessions. (NH)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Program Design, Program Effectiveness, Reading Aloud to Others
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dulaney, Kathy H. – Reading Improvement, 1988
Argues for the consideration of five major components that must be addressed within each local school or school system: 1) curriculum; 2) methodology; 3) organization; 4) administration; and 5) staff development. Emphasizes the support and active involvement of the local superintendent of education in this reading improvement process. (RAE)
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Administrator Role, Curriculum Development, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kagan, Dona M. – Reading Improvement, 1988
Evaluates the effectiveness of a sixth grade experimental language arts program designed to teach higher-level thinking skills. Reports on different types of instruments for measuring higher-level thinking skills, including verbal and nonverbal tests of divergent thinking, a nonverbal test of flexible thinking, and a verbal divergent production…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Creative Thinking, Critical Thinking, Divergent Thinking