Descriptor
| Intelligence Tests | 9 |
| Test Reviews | 5 |
| Test Validity | 5 |
| Construct Validity | 4 |
| Scoring | 4 |
| Test Use | 4 |
| Theories | 4 |
| Test Content | 3 |
| Test Interpretation | 3 |
| Test Reliability | 3 |
| Children | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Sternberg, Robert J. | 2 |
| Baker, Carl E. | 1 |
| Boland, Lyn | 1 |
| Brody, Nathan | 1 |
| Gottfredson, Linda S. | 1 |
| O'Brien, Francis J., Jr. | 1 |
| Ord, Geoff | 1 |
| Reber, Anne M. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Book/Product Reviews | 9 |
| Journal Articles | 6 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Australia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Stanford Binet Intelligence… | 1 |
| Wechsler Intelligence Scale… | 1 |
| Wechsler Preschool and… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedBrody, Nathan – Intelligence, 2003
Responds to issues raised by R. Sternberg in his response to commentary on the Sternberg Triarchic Abilities Test. Presents a synopsis of the conclusions that should have been derived from data obtained by Sternberg and his colleagues about the construct validity of the measure. (SLD)
Descriptors: Construct Validity, Intelligence Tests, Theories
Peer reviewedSternberg, Robert J. – Intelligence, 2003
Discusses the research program construct validating the triarchic theory of successful intelligence and discusses objections raised to the triarchic theory and the criticisms of L. Gottfredson. (SLD)
Descriptors: Construct Validity, Intelligence Tests, Theories
Peer reviewedGottfredson, Linda S. – Intelligence, 2003
Comments that R. Sternberg does not address criticisms previously made by L. Gottfredson, but rather discusses his theory of successful intelligence and answers only self-posed objections from unspecified critics. (SLD)
Descriptors: Construct Validity, Intelligence Tests, Theories
Peer reviewedSternberg, Robert J. – Intelligence, 2003
Discusses a number of issues raised in Brody's analysis of ability measurements based on the triarchic theory of successful intelligence, such as restriction of range, obtained variance attributed to "g," and aptitude-treatment interactions. (SLD)
Descriptors: Aptitude Treatment Interaction, Construct Validity, Intelligence Tests, Theories
Ord, Geoff – Psychological Test Bulletin, 1988
The manual for the Fourth Edition of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale is reviewed. The test has been updated in content and design, following a rationale that is likely to make it a major individual intelligence test. The test appears readily adaptable to use in Australia. (SLD)
Descriptors: Book Reviews, Culture Fair Tests, Foreign Countries, Guides
Reber, Anne M. – 1995
The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III) is an individually administered test of intelligence for assessing children aged 6 through 16 years, 11 months. The WISC-III consists of several subtests, each classified into a verbal or performance scale. The child's performance on these measures is summarized in three…
Descriptors: Children, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests, Performance Based Assessment
Boland, Lyn – Psychological Test Bulletin, 1990
The theoretical background, organization, performance subtests (object assembly, geometric design, block design, mazes, picture completion, and animal pegs), verbal subtests (information, comprehension, arithmetic, vocabulary, similarities, and sentences), reliability, validity (factor analysis), interpretation, advantages, and limitations of the…
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Performance Tests, Preschool Education, Primary Education
Baker, Carl E. – 1995
The Detroit Tests of Learning Aptitude, 3rd Edition (DLTA-3) is a battery of 11 subtests that measure different but interrelated mental abilities. These are clinically assessed by the battery, which further attempts to delineate the factors that contribute to Spearman's factor for general intelligence. The DLTA-3 has age norms expressed for test…
Descriptors: Aptitude Tests, Children, Clinical Diagnosis, Diagnostic Tests
O'Brien, Francis J., Jr. – 1987
The Goldstein-Scheerer Tests of Abstract and Concrete Thinking are reviewed. This evaluative summary supplements several reviews in the Mental Measurements Yearbook series. The Goldstein-Scheerer tests are used by clinicians and researchers to distinguish normal individuals (those able to engage in two qualitatively different levels of cognitive…
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Adults, Cognitive Tests, Concept Formation


