Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
| Automation | 1 |
| Cheating | 1 |
| Computer Science Education | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Distance Education | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Graduate Study | 1 |
| Identification | 1 |
| Integrity | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| ACM Transactions on Computing… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMike Richards; Kevin Waugh; Mark A Slaymaker; Marian Petre; John Woodthorpe; Daniel Gooch – ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 2024
Cheating has been a long-standing issue in university assessments. However, the release of ChatGPT and other free-to-use generative AI tools has provided a new and distinct method for cheating. Students can run many assessment questions through the tool and generate a superficially compelling answer, which may or may not be accurate. We ran a…
Descriptors: Computer Science Education, Artificial Intelligence, Cheating, Student Evaluation
