Descriptor
| Context Effect | 1 |
| Crime | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Evaluation Research | 1 |
| Law Enforcement | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Political Influences | 1 |
| Program Evaluation | 1 |
| Public Policy | 1 |
| Sentencing | 1 |
| Stakeholders | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Evaluation and Program… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Tennessee | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedHallett, Michael A.; Rogers, Robert – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1994
This article promotes the use of contextual constructionism in evaluation research. The call for truth in sentencing in Tennessee (and across the country) is used to illustrate the conflict among stakeholders that arises from program evaluation and to show how their multiple realities make a contextual constructionist approach pertinent. (SLD)
Descriptors: Context Effect, Crime, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Research
