Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Publication Type
Information Analyses | 1 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 2 |
Secondary Education | 2 |
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Grade 6 | 1 |
Grade 7 | 1 |
Grade 8 | 1 |
Intermediate Grades | 1 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Location
Florida | 2 |
North Carolina | 2 |
Arizona | 1 |
Arkansas | 1 |
Colorado | 1 |
Kansas | 1 |
Kentucky | 1 |
Louisiana | 1 |
Massachusetts | 1 |
West Virginia | 1 |
Wisconsin | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Florida Comprehensive… | 2 |
Massachusetts Comprehensive… | 1 |
North Carolina End of Course… | 1 |
Wisconsin Knowledge and… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Hedberg, E. C.; Hedges, Larry V. – Grantee Submission, 2014
Randomized experiments are often considered the strongest designs to study the impact of educational interventions. Perhaps the most prevalent class of designs used in large scale education experiments is the cluster randomized design in which entire schools are assigned to treatments. In cluster randomized trials (CRTs) that assign schools to…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Correlation, School Districts, Institutional Characteristics
Xu, Zeyu; Nichols, Austin – National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research, 2010
The gold standard in making causal inference on program effects is a randomized trial. Most randomization designs in education randomize classrooms or schools rather than individual students. Such "clustered randomization" designs have one principal drawback: They tend to have limited statistical power or precision. This study aims to…
Descriptors: Test Format, Reading Tests, Norm Referenced Tests, Research Design