Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Computation | 2 |
| Data Analysis | 2 |
| Reliability | 2 |
| Student Evaluation | 2 |
| Validity | 2 |
| Adolescents | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Criteria | 1 |
| Disabilities | 1 |
| Error of Measurement | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Grade 10 | 1 |
| Grade 11 | 1 |
| Grade 12 | 1 |
| Grade 9 | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| New York | 2 |
| United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkCorrigan, M. J.; Gurdineer, E. E. – Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 2012
Objective: This article reports on two separate studies of reliability of the Adolescent Domain Screening Inventory (ADSI), test-retest and internal consistency analyses. The ADSI has shown adequate validity, although reliability has not been established. Methods: Study 1: Students were recruited from two undergraduate courses (N = 29).…
Descriptors: Evidence, Student Evaluation, Data Analysis, Screening Tests
Download full textHaertel, Edward H. – National Assessment Governing Board, 2003
The paper initially describes the sources of uncertainty in National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) data and standard errors. As NAEP sample sizes have increased, greater precision has been attained by the program. For this reason, exclusion effects are increasingly important. Two scenarios of revised NAEP results are presented (for New…
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Computation, Disabilities, Limited English Speaking
