Descriptor
| Discrimination Learning | 2 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Computer Uses in Education | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Logical Thinking | 1 |
| Preschool Children | 1 |
| Preschool Education | 1 |
| Stimuli | 1 |
| Training | 1 |
| Visual Discrimination | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Netherlands | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedSmeets, Paul M.; Striefel, Sebastian – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1990
Findings of a series of studies involving kindergarteners indicated that the delay technique was highly effective when the prompt had the same configuration as the correct stimulus and the prompt's position prevented control by irrelevant location cues. The effectiveness of delayed orientation prompting was not always matched by its efficiency.…
Descriptors: Cues, Discrimination Learning, Foreign Countries, Preschool Children
Direct linkCarpentier, Franck; Smeets, Paul M.; Barnes-Holmes, Dermot – Psychological Record, 2004
Previous studies have shown that after being trained on A-B and A-C match-to-sample tasks, adults match not only same-class B and C stimuli (equivalence) but also BC compounds with same-class elements and with different-class elements (BC-BC). The assumption was that the BC-BC performances are based on matching equivalence and nonequivalence…
Descriptors: Stimuli, Discrimination Learning, Visual Discrimination, Logical Thinking
