Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Classroom Communication | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| English (Second Language) | 1 |
| Error Correction | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Focus Groups | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Interviews | 1 |
| Language Teachers | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| GIST Education and Learning… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Mexico | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textGarcia-Ponce, Edgar Emmanuell; Mora-Pablo, Irasema – GIST Education and Learning Research Journal, 2017
Extensive research literature suggests that corrective feedback (CF), when effective, has a beneficial impact on the development of learners' interlanguage. This is because CF provides learners with language data concerning the correctness of their utterances and thus pushes their oral production towards greater clarity, accuracy and…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Feedback (Response), Focus Groups, Teacher Attitudes
