Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| College Students | 2 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Feedback (Response) | 2 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Revision (Written Composition) | 2 |
| Asians | 1 |
| Check Lists | 1 |
| Control Groups | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| English (Second Language) | 1 |
| Essays | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| English Language Teaching | 1 |
| TESL-EJ | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| Japan | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Coomber, Matthew – TESL-EJ, 2016
Second language writers need to develop the ability to revise their writing independently of third party advice; thus, it is important that teachers devise methods by which to promote habits of self-directed revision. This quasi-experimental study investigates three classroom activities designed to encourage students to independently revise essays…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Revision (Written Composition), Quasiexperimental Design, College Students
Wakabayashi, Reina – English Language Teaching, 2013
The purpose of this study is to determine which is more beneficial to improving learner writing: reviewing peer texts or one's own text. The study took place over one semester at a Japanese university with 51 students enrolled in two writing classes at two proficiency levels. The students at the lower proficiency level reviewed peer texts, while…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Scores, Student Attitudes

Peer reviewed
