Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Author
| Adkins, Deborah | 1 |
| Cronin, John | 1 |
| Dahlin, Michael | 1 |
| Gilman, David A. | 1 |
| Hess, G. Alfred, Jr. | 1 |
| Kingsbury, G. Gage | 1 |
| Nelson, F. Howard | 1 |
| Reynolds, Laura L. | 1 |
| Schrader, Vincent E. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 10 | 1 |
| Grade 4 | 1 |
| Grade 8 | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Indiana | 5 |
| California | 2 |
| Illinois | 2 |
| South Carolina | 2 |
| Texas | 2 |
| Arizona | 1 |
| Arkansas | 1 |
| Colorado | 1 |
| Delaware | 1 |
| Florida | 1 |
| Idaho | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Indiana Statewide Testing for… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedSchrader, Vincent E. – Contemporary Education, 1991
Describes the cash award system Indiana developed to reward schools for relative improvement in language arts proficiency, mathematics proficiency, overall achievement performance, and attendance. The article looks at problems with the program, how the program was implemented, how money was used, and positive and negative rhetoric. (SM)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Tests, Awards, Educational Improvement
Peer reviewedGilman, David A.; Reynolds, Laura L. – Contemporary Education, 1991
Summarizes interviews with 60 Indiana superintendents and principals concerning the effects of statewide student achievement testing on the operation of schools or school systems. It describes side effects from the testing, noting they are so numerous and severe they may be worse than the problems they are supposed to cure. (SM)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Administrator Attitudes, Educational Planning, Educational Testing
Center on Education Policy, 2009
This year the Center on Education Policy (CEP) analyzed data on the achievement of different groups of students in two distinct ways. First, it looked at grade 4 test results to determine whether the performance of various groups improved at three achievement levels--basic and above, proficient and above, and advanced. Second, it looked at gaps…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Low Income, American Indians, African American Students
Cronin, John; Dahlin, Michael; Adkins, Deborah; Kingsbury, G. Gage – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2007
At the heart of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is the call for all students to be "proficient" in reading and mathematics by 2014. Yet the law expects each state to define proficiency as it sees fit and design its own tests. This study investigated three research questions related to this policy: (1) How consistent are various…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Mathematics Tests, Test Validity, Reading Tests
Nelson, F. Howard; Hess, G. Alfred, Jr. – 1985
This draft document presents an analysis of all major educational reform proposals before the Illinois General Assembly, assessing the costs of implementation and what benefits might be expected for the funding levels contained in the proposals themselves. The 18 areas examined are (1) student testing; (2) student retention/remediation; (3)…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Attendance, Curriculum Development, Dropout Prevention


