Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Cognitive Processes | 2 |
| College Students | 2 |
| Color | 2 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Interference (Learning) | 2 |
| Reaction Time | 2 |
| Visual Stimuli | 2 |
| Cognitive Psychology | 1 |
| Conflict | 1 |
| Congruence (Psychology) | 1 |
| Contingency Management | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Experimental… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| Canada | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Stroop Color Word Test | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkSpinelli, Giacomo; Lupker, Stephen J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2023
In the standard Proportion-Congruent (PC) paradigm, performance is compared between a list containing mostly congruent (MC) stimuli (e.g., the word RED in the color red in the Stroop task; Stroop, 1935) and a list containing mostly incongruent (MI) stimuli (e.g., the word BLUE in red). The PC effect, the finding that the congruency effect (i.e.,…
Descriptors: Cognitive Psychology, Conflict, Cognitive Processes, Reaction Time
Spinelli, Giacomo; Krishna, Kesheni; Perry, Jason R.; Lupker, Stephen J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2020
A consistent finding in the Stroop literature is that congruency effects (i.e., the color-naming latency difference between words presented in incongruent vs. congruent colors) are larger for mostly-congruent items (e.g., the word RED presented most often in red) than for mostly-incongruent items (e.g., the word GREEN presented most often in…
Descriptors: Short Term Memory, Cognitive Processes, Difficulty Level, Color
