Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Biology | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Doctoral Dissertations | 1 |
| Educational Benefits | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Graduate Students | 1 |
| Health Sciences | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Publications | 1 |
| Risk | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Corter, A. | 1 |
| Jowsey, T. | 1 |
| Thompson, A. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Australia | 1 |
| New Zealand | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkJowsey, T.; Corter, A.; Thompson, A. – Higher Education Research and Development, 2020
This study explores the views of doctoral students and supervisors about two doctoral thesis-writing models: the traditional monograph and the thesis that includes published articles in its body. Doctoral theses in biological and health sciences usually follow one of these two common models. Doctoral theses with publications are increasingly…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Graduate Students, Doctoral Dissertations, Journal Articles
