Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Asians | 1 |
| Control Groups | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| English (Second Language) | 1 |
| English for Academic Purposes | 1 |
| Error Correction | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Grammar | 1 |
| Instructional Effectiveness | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Bitchener, John | 1 |
| Rummel, Stephanie | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Australia | 1 |
| Laos | 1 |
| New Zealand | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
The Effectiveness of Written Corrective Feedback and the Impact Lao Learners' Beliefs Have on Uptake
Peer reviewed
Direct linkRummel, Stephanie; Bitchener, John – Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 2015
This article presents the results of a study examining the effectiveness of written corrective feedback (CF) on the simple past tense and the impact beliefs may have on students' uptake of the feedback they receive. A seven-week study was carried out with 42 advanced EFL learners in Vientiane, Laos. Students' beliefs about written CF were first…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Pretests Posttests, Cues, Grammar
