Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 10 |
Descriptor
Source
Arizona Department of… | 2 |
Center on Education Policy | 2 |
Thomas B. Fordham Institute | 2 |
Career Development and… | 1 |
National Center for Education… | 1 |
Project Forum | 1 |
Regional Educational… | 1 |
Author
Avoke, Selete | 1 |
Barrat, Vanessa X. | 1 |
Carlson, Elaine | 1 |
Crane, Eric W. | 1 |
Cronin, John | 1 |
Dahlin, Michael | 1 |
Emenheiser, David E. | 1 |
Fiore, Thomas A. | 1 |
Huang, Min | 1 |
McCahon, Donna | 1 |
Muller, Eve | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Descriptive | 4 |
Reports - Evaluative | 4 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 3 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 5 |
Elementary Education | 4 |
Grade 4 | 4 |
Grade 8 | 4 |
Secondary Education | 4 |
Grade 3 | 3 |
Grade 5 | 3 |
Grade 6 | 3 |
Grade 7 | 3 |
High Schools | 3 |
Early Childhood Education | 2 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Location
Arizona | 10 |
California | 2 |
Colorado | 2 |
Florida | 2 |
Georgia | 2 |
Maryland | 2 |
Montana | 2 |
North Dakota | 2 |
Washington | 2 |
Arkansas | 1 |
Connecticut | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 5 |
Individuals with Disabilities… | 2 |
Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Emenheiser, David E.; Weidenthal, Corinne; Avoke, Selete; Simon-Burroughs, Marlene – Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 2021
Promoting the Readiness of Minors in Supplemental Security Income (PROMISE), a study of 13,444 randomly assigned youth and their families, includes six model demonstration projects and a technical assistance center funded through the U.S. Department of Education and a national evaluation of the model demonstration projects funded through the…
Descriptors: Welfare Services, Federal Programs, Low Income Groups, Disabilities
Muller, Eve – Project Forum, 2011
Evidence strongly supports the notion that juvenile offenders, both with and without disabilities, are significantly more likely to experience successful reentry into their home schools and communities if appropriate programs and supports are in place. In spite of this, comprehensive state-level reentry programs for youth are few and far between.…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Juvenile Justice, Rehabilitation, Delinquency
Fiore, Thomas A.; Nimkoff, Tamara; Munk, Tom; Carlson, Elaine – National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, 2013
The "Personnel Development Program to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities" is authorized under Section 662 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and is known as the Personnel Development Program (PDP). The PDP is administered by the U.S. Department of Education's (ED's) Office of Special…
Descriptors: Staff Development, Federal Programs, Program Evaluation, Special Education
Center on Education Policy, 2010
This paper provides information about the Arizona's Instrument to Measure Standards (AIMS). The purpose of the test is to determine prospective high school graduates' mastery of the state curriculum and to meet a state mandate. [For the main report, "State High School Tests: Exit Exams and Other Assessments", see ED514155.]
Descriptors: High Schools, High School Graduates, Exit Examinations, Academic Standards
Crane, Eric W.; Huang, Min; Barrat, Vanessa X. – Regional Educational Laboratory West, 2011
This technical brief examines the 2008/09 reading and math proficiency levels among subgroups of Arizona public school students defined by students' race/ethnicity (American Indian, Asian, Black, Hispanic, and White), English language learner status (English language learner students and non-English language learner students), disability status…
Descriptors: High Schools, Race, Charter Schools, Middle Schools
Arizona Department of Education, 2006
This brochure describes "Child Find," a component of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) that requires states to identify, locate, and evaluate all children with disabilities, aged birth through 21, who are in need of early intervention or special education services.
Descriptors: Early Intervention, Disabilities, Federal Legislation, High Risk Students
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Arizona Department of Education, 2010
As part of compliance with with the federal No Child Left Behind Act, this document presents the State Report Card of Arizona for 2009-2010. The report card provides tables relating to percentage of students who passed AIMS in Arizona by subject and grade. The tables shown in this document include: (1) Mathematics Grade 3; (2) Reading Grade 3; (3)…
Descriptors: Graduation Rate, Definitions, Educational Improvement, Federal Programs
Cronin, John; Dahlin, Michael; Xiang, Yun; McCahon, Donna – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states have leeway to: (1) Craft their own academic standards, select their own tests, and define…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Center on Education Policy, 2009
This year the Center on Education Policy (CEP) analyzed data on the achievement of different groups of students in two distinct ways. First, it looked at grade 4 test results to determine whether the performance of various groups improved at three achievement levels--basic and above, proficient and above, and advanced. Second, it looked at gaps…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Low Income, American Indians, African American Students