Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Publication Type
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
| High Schools | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
| Secondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| California | 1 |
| China | 1 |
| Germany | 1 |
| Illinois | 1 |
| India | 1 |
| Japan | 1 |
| Massachusetts | 1 |
| Pennsylvania | 1 |
| Taiwan | 1 |
| United Kingdom | 1 |
| United States | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 3 |
Assessments and Surveys
| National Assessment of… | 2 |
| National Survey of Student… | 2 |
| Advanced Placement… | 1 |
| Program for International… | 1 |
| Trends in International… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Atkinson, Robert; Mayo, Merrilea – Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, 2010
Innovation has powered America's economy, creating good jobs and a high standard of living. Yet, the U.S. share of innovation-based industries is in decline, jeopardizing our status as the world's innovation leader. And one reason is that the United States has been unable to produce enough of its own workers with sufficient skills in science,…
Descriptors: STEM Education, Educational Innovation, Economic Progress, Educational Needs
Atkinson, Robert D.; Mayo, Merrilea – Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, 2010
Is the United States getting it wrong when it comes to educating tomorrow's innovators in critical fields? It has been known for years that the only way to compete globally in information technology, engineering, nanotechnology, robotics and other fields is to give students the best educational opportunities possible. But do individuals have a…
Descriptors: Educational Opportunities, STEM Education, Educational Innovation, Economic Progress
Schoen, LaTefy; Fusarelli, Lance D. – Educational Policy, 2008
This article explores the impact of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) on the behavior of teachers and school leaders, specifically the centralizing, standardizing tendencies of the legislation, and juxtaposes their reactions to the types of teaching and leadership required to lead 21st-century schools. The authors argue that the isomorphic…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Principals, Teacher Behavior, Administrator Behavior

Peer reviewed
Direct link
