ERIC Number: ED672050
Record Type: Non-Journal
Publication Date: 2022-May
Pages: 61
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: N/A
EISSN: N/A
Available Date: 0000-00-00
The Rise of (E)quality Politics: The Political Development of Higher Education Policy, 1969-1999. EdWorkingPaper No. 22-571
Heather McCambly; Quinn Mulroy
Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University
Public discussions of racial inclusion and equal opportunity initiatives in the U.S. are often met with claims that expanding access to an institution, space, or public good is likely to diminish its quality. Examples of this pattern include: anticipated (and real) property value declines when predominantly white neighborhoods become more racially diverse; fears that the excellence of white schools will decline when the population of Black and brown students grows; apprehensions that equitable hiring practices necessarily entail lower standards for job candidates. In this paper, we examine how a federal agency, the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education (FIPSE), charged with addressing the aftermath of the 'access wave' of new college students promulgated by the Higher Education Act of 1965, came to reconcile its commitments to educational equity and quality. Through a novel examination of the historical development of what we term "(e)quality politics" in the administration of civil rights policy in higher education, we trace how two concepts - equity and quality -- became discursively linked and contested in American politics. "(E)quality politics" refers to the introduction of a policy paradigm that reframes equity discussions and goals around the professed need to preserve and advance institutional "quality" using measures and standards that are, importantly, defined and instantiated under the era of segregation that precedes equal access policies. In particular, we uncover the discursive patterns by which the perceived threats to "quality" posed by racial diversity can prompt administrators to compensate, protect, and maintain the prerogatives of high-status institutions or groups that benefited under previous eras of exclusion. Understood as part of a backlash to egalitarian reforms, we argue, these quality measures undermine equity goals. [Financial assistance was provided by the Institute for Policy Research's Summer RA Program and Northwestern University's Undergraduate Research Assistance Program.]
Descriptors: Politics of Education, Equal Education, Educational History, Higher Education, Educational Policy, Access to Education, Educational Quality, Political Attitudes, Racial Attitudes, Educational Legislation, Federal Legislation, Government Publications, Content Analysis, Federal Aid, Public Agencies, Government Employees, Employee Attitudes
Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University. Brown University Box 1985, Providence, RI 02912. Tel: 401-863-7990; Fax: 401-863-1290; e-mail: annenberg@brown.edu; Web site: https://annenberg.brown.edu/
Publication Type: Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education; Postsecondary Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University
Identifiers - Laws, Policies, & Programs: Higher Education Act 1965; Higher Education Act Title IV; Higher Education Act Title III
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A
Author Affiliations: N/A