Descriptor
| Freedom of Speech | 3 |
| Legal Problems | 3 |
| Broadcast Industry | 2 |
| Censorship | 2 |
| Civil Rights | 2 |
| Court Litigation | 2 |
| Publishing Industry | 2 |
| Civil Disobedience | 1 |
| Communication Research | 1 |
| Constitutional Law | 1 |
| Government Role | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journalism Quarterly | 1 |
Author
| Stonecipher, Harry W. | 3 |
| Trager, Robert | 2 |
| Sneed, Don | 1 |
Publication Type
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| First Amendment | 3 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedStonecipher, Harry W.; Trager, Robert – Journalism Quarterly, 1976
Details the implications for libel suits against the press of the law's distinction between public figures and private individuals. (KS)
Descriptors: Broadcast Industry, Censorship, Civil Rights, Freedom of Speech
Trager, Robert; Stonecipher, Harry W. – 1976
Since the "New York Times Co. v. Sullivan" decision in 1964, courts have debated the degrees of protection from defamation that should be offered to individuals and the concomitant degree of freedom that the press should have to report on matters of public concern. Most recently, the Supreme Court has attempted to balance these competing…
Descriptors: Broadcast Industry, Censorship, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation
Sneed, Don; Stonecipher, Harry W. – 1989
The ultimate test of the speech-action dichotomy, as it relates to symbolic speech to be considered by the courts, may be the fasting of prison inmates who use hunger strikes to protest the conditions of their confinement or to make political statements. While hunger strikes have been utilized by prisoners for years as a means of protest, it was…
Descriptors: Civil Disobedience, Civil Rights, Communication Research, Court Litigation


