How the Courts Have Interpreted the Related Services Mandate.

Osborne, Allen G., Jr.

Notes FAQ Contact Us

Back to results

Peer reviewed

ERIC Number: EJ310155

Record Type: Journal

Publication Date: 1984

Pages: N/A

Abstractor: N/A

ISBN: N/A

ISSN: N/A

EISSN: N/A

Available Date: N/A

How the Courts Have Interpreted the Related Services Mandate.

Osborne, Allen G., Jr.

Exceptional Children, v51 n3 p249-52 Nov 1984

The author examines how the courts have interpreted the related services mandate in P.L. 94-142, the Education for All Handicapped Children Act, and offers some guidelines as to what is and is not required in terms of psychotherapy, health services, physical plant accessibility, parent training and counseling, and extracurricular activities. (Author/CL)

Descriptors: Accessibility (for Disabled), Court Litigation, Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education, Health Services, Parent Education, Psychotherapy, Related Services (Special Education)

Publication Type: Journal Articles; Information Analyses; Opinion Papers

Education Level: N/A

Audience: N/A

Language: English

Sponsor: N/A

Authoring Institution: N/A

Identifiers - Laws, Policies, & Programs: Education for All Handicapped Children Act

Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A

Author Affiliations: N/A