NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 15 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Dang, Trang Thi Doan; Scull, Janet; Chowdhury, Raqib – International Journal of Instruction, 2022
This exploratory study investigated Vietnamese secondary students' engagement in a sequence of detecting, correcting, and rewriting tasks, and examined the factors affecting their engagement and/or disengagement in the process. The study draws on the principles of task-based instruction, involving eight mixed-ability groups (n = 31), and was…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Secondary School Students, Feedback (Response), Error Correction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Elfiyanto, Sonny; Fukazawa, Seiji – International Journal of Instruction, 2021
The quality of written corrective feedback can strongly and positively affect students' writing achievement levels. This study aimed to examine whether written corrective feedback could improve students' achievement levels for essay writing and investigated which one from three different feedback sources--teacher, peer, and self--was effective in…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Feedback (Response), Writing Achievement, Achievement Gains
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Oliver, Lucy – Language and Education, 2019
This multicase study explores students' understandings about revision in the light of successive findings that they typically revise their texts little and at superficial levels. Students' limited revising has been variously explained, both in terms of cognitive-metacognitive factors and restrictive school models. Few studies, however, have…
Descriptors: Revision (Written Composition), Writing (Composition), Writing Skills, Editing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dang, Trang Thi Doan; Scull, Janet; Chowdhury, Raqib – Issues in Educational Research, 2022
Although the effect of teacher and peer feedback on writing improvement in the field of second language teaching has been discussed in scholarly research for several decades, student engagement with both forms of feedback integrated into a sequence of discovery, correction and revision remains under-researched. This study investigates the impact…
Descriptors: Vietnamese People, Secondary School Students, Feedback (Response), Second Language Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kalianne L. Neumann; Theodore J. Kopcha – International Journal of Designs for Learning, 2019
This paper presents a design case that describes the design, development, and user experience testing of a Google Docs revision add-on. The add-on is an instructional, peer review tool intended to help students distinguish surface-level feedback from text-based feedback in order to develop their revision task schema. Eleven secondary teachers…
Descriptors: Revision (Written Composition), Feedback (Response), Web 2.0 Technologies, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Banaruee, Hassan; Khatin-Zadeh, Omid; Ruegg, Rachael – Cogent Education, 2018
There might always be errors during the learning process which need correction; accordingly, providing corrective feedback is critical. However, the various types of feedback applied during classes affect the learning and teaching process. Teaching and learning could be applied within EFL classes by providing learners with recasts. Recasts have…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), English (Second Language), English Language Learners, High School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Katherine E. Batchelor – English Education, 2018
This article describes the results of a study that examined middle school students' written revisions as well as attitudes and perceptions regarding revision when paired with transmediation. Existing research on revision is thin on transmediation's affordances and students' voices regarding revision. Situated within a social semiotic, multimodal…
Descriptors: Middle School Teachers, Middle School Students, Writing Instruction, Revision (Written Composition)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Sherpa, Sonam Zangpo – LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 2021
This study investigated the effect of direct and indirect written corrective feedback (WCF) on the grammatical accuracy in the use of past tense and articles by grade eight learners (n = 45). The study also explored the extent to which the use of WCF may affect the syntactic complexity in the learners' writing. The learners were selected and…
Descriptors: Direct Instruction, Feedback (Response), Error Correction, Revision (Written Composition)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chen, Zhenzhen; Chen, Weichao; Jia, Jiyou; Le, Huixiao – Language Learning & Technology, 2022
Despite the growing interest in investigating the pedagogical application of Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) systems, studies on the process of AWE-supported writing are still scant. Adopting activity theory as the framework, this qualitative study aims to examine how students incorporated AWE feedback into their writing in an English as a…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Writing Processes, Teaching Methods, Learning Strategies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Lira-Gonzales, Maria-Lourdes; Nassaji, Hossein – TESL Canada Journal, 2020
This study examined and compared different written corrective feedback techniques used by English as a second language (ESL) teachers in three different educational contexts and levels (primary, secondary, and college) in Quebec, Canada. In particular, it examined whether there were any differences in the types of errors made, the kind and degree…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Feedback (Response), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Dang, Trang Thi Doan – English Language Teaching, 2016
It has been theoretically and empirically acknowledged that collaborative feedback is beneficial to learning achievement. However, feedback research remains relatively contentious due to learners' differing viewpoints on how feedback is best given. Although a large number of studies have explored learners' perspectives on collaborative feedback,…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, English (Second Language), Second Language Instruction, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Karasu, H. Pelin – Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 2014
The editing and revision stages are an important part of the writing process. This study documented the types of revisions, revision units, and revision methods used during writing conferences with hearing-impaired students. The study included seventeen hearing-impaired students educated with the auditory/oral approach and enrolled in grades six…
Descriptors: Hearing Impairments, Editing, Revision (Written Composition), Grade 6
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Simard, Daphnée; Guénette, Danièle; Bergeron, Annie – Language Awareness, 2015
The impact written corrective feedback (WCF) has on second language development is still a subject of much debate. While some believe it leads to improvement, others are more sceptical. But in order for WCF to lead to second language improvement, learners must first be able to not only correctly interpret the WCF but also understand the linguistic…
Descriptors: Metalinguistics, Second Language Learning, English (Second Language), French
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Santos, Maria; Lopez-Serrano, Sonia; Manchon, Rosa M. – International Journal of English Studies, 2010
Framed in a cognitively-oriented strand of research on corrective feedback (CF) in SLA, the controlled three-stage (composition/comparison-noticing/revision) study reported in this paper investigated the effects of two forms of direct CF (error correction and reformulation) on noticing and uptake, as evidenced in the written output produced by a…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Writing (Composition), Error Correction, English (Second Language)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Myhill, Debra; Jones, Susan – Written Communication, 2007
Drawing on the second phase of a 2-year study of students' linguistic and compositional processes, this article describes students' reflections on their online revision processes, those revisions made during the process of translating thoughts into written text. The data collected were from classroom observation and post hoc interviews with 34…
Descriptors: Observation, Writing Instruction, Error Correction, Student Attitudes