Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Source
| Grantee Submission | 1 |
| ProQuest LLC | 1 |
Publication Type
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Early Childhood Education | 2 |
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Grade 3 | 2 |
| Intermediate Grades | 2 |
| Primary Education | 2 |
| Grade 2 | 1 |
| Grade 4 | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
| California | 1 |
| Oregon | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Dynamic Indicators of Basic… | 1 |
| Flesch Kincaid Grade Level… | 1 |
| easyCBM | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textNese, Joseph F. T.; Kahn, Josh; Kamata, Akihito – Grantee Submission, 2017
Despite prevalent use and practical application, the current and standard assessment of oral reading fluency (ORF) presents considerable limitations which reduces its validity in estimating growth and monitoring student progress, including: (a) high cost of implementation; (b) tenuous passage equivalence; and (c) bias, large standard error, and…
Descriptors: Automation, Speech, Recognition (Psychology), Scores
Direct linkChecca, Christopher Jason – ProQuest LLC, 2012
The use of oral reading fluency (ORF) passages within a Response to Intervention (RTI) framework is examined. Significant limitations within the current ORF research are discussed. The passage equivalency and readability scores for DIBELS Next, AIMSweb, and a school district's curriculum's ORF passages are evaluated using Generalizability Theory…
Descriptors: Reading Fluency, Oral Reading, Reading Tests, Predictive Validity
