NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 78 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tay McEdwards; Greta R. Underhill – Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 2025
Online learning has steadily increased since well before the COVID-19 pandemic (Seaman et al., 2018), but research has yet to explore online students' perceptions of online exam proctoring methods. The purpose of this exploratory study was to understand the perceptions of fully online students regarding types of proctoring at a large state…
Descriptors: Supervision, Computer Assisted Testing, Electronic Learning, Student Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mohamed Kara-Mohamed – Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 2025
(1) Context: The growing accessibility of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology, such as ChatGPT, poses a challenge to the integrity of online assessments in higher education. As AI becomes more integrated into academic contexts, educators face the complex task of maintaining assessment standards particularly within modern Virtual Learning…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Virtual Classrooms, Computer Assisted Testing, Universities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
David A. Joyner; Zoey Anne Beda; Michael Cohen; Melanie Duffin; Amy Garcia Fernandez; Liz Hayes-Golding; Jonathan Hildreth; Alex Houk; Rebecca Johnson; Kayla Matcheck; Ana Santos – International Educational Data Mining Society, 2024
This study examines log data from proctored examinations from two classes offered as part of a large online graduate program in computer science. In these two classes, students are permitted to access any internet content during their exams, which themselves have remained largely unchanged over the last several semesters. As a result, when ChatGPT…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Tests, Internet, Graduate Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jonas Flodén – British Educational Research Journal, 2025
This study compares how the generative AI (GenAI) large language model (LLM) ChatGPT performs in grading university exams compared to human teachers. Aspects investigated include consistency, large discrepancies and length of answer. Implications for higher education, including the role of teachers and ethics, are also discussed. Three…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Artificial Intelligence, Comparative Testing, Scoring
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yusuf Oc; Hela Hassen – Marketing Education Review, 2025
Driven by technological innovations, continuous digital expansion has transformed fundamentally the landscape of modern higher education, leading to discussions about evaluation techniques. The emergence of generative artificial intelligence raises questions about reliability and academic honesty regarding multiple-choice assessments in online…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Multiple Choice Tests, Computer Assisted Testing, Electronic Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Ilhama Mammadova; Fatime Ismayilli; Elnaz Aliyeva; Narmin Mammadova – Educational Process: International Journal, 2025
Background/purpose: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly shaping assessment practices in higher education, promising faster feedback and reduced instructor workload while also raising concerns about fairness and transparency. This study examines how AI technologies are transforming assessment processes and the experiences of stakeholders.…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Student Evaluation, Technology Uses in Education, Undergraduate Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Daniel Lupiya Mpolomoka – Pedagogical Research, 2025
Overview: This systematic review explores the utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) for assessment, grading, and feedback in higher education. The review aims to establish how AI technologies enhance efficiency, scalability, and personalized learning experiences in educational settings, while addressing associated challenges that arise due…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Higher Education, Evaluation Methods, Literature Reviews
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gulnur Tyulepberdinova; Madina Mansurova; Talshyn Sarsembayeva; Sulu Issabayeva; Darazha Issabayeva – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2024
Background: This study aims to assess how well several machine learning (ML) algorithms predict the physical, social, and mental health condition of university students. Objectives: The physical health measurements used in the study include BMI (Body Mass Index), %BF (percentage of Body Fat), BSC (Blood Serum Cholesterol), SBP (Systolic Blood…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Algorithms, Predictor Variables, Physical Health
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rebecka Weegar; Peter Idestam-Almquist – International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2024
Machine learning methods can be used to reduce the manual workload in exam grading, making it possible for teachers to spend more time on other tasks. However, when it comes to grading exams, fully eliminating manual work is not yet possible even with very accurate automated grading, as any grading mistakes could have significant consequences for…
Descriptors: Grading, Computer Assisted Testing, Introductory Courses, Computer Science Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sundas Azeem; Muhammad Abbas – Education and Information Technologies, 2025
The study examined the association of big five personality traits (i.e., conscientiousness, openness to experience, and neuroticism) with use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) among university students. It also examined the moderating role of perceived fairness in grading on the relationships of personality traits with GenAI usage.…
Descriptors: Personality Traits, Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Technology Integration
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sofie van den Berg; Pantelis M. Papadopoulos – Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2025
This qualitative study explores the levels of technology acceptance of students and teachers in higher education regarding the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in summative assessment. Twelve students and eight teachers of a university expressed their views on a series of hypothetical scenarios. Stimulated recall interviews, using hypothetical…
Descriptors: Summative Evaluation, Artificial Intelligence, Qualitative Research, Technology Uses in Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jussi S. Jauhiainen; Agustín Garagorry Guerra – Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2025
The study highlights ChatGPT-4's potential in educational settings for the evaluation of university students' open-ended written examination responses. ChatGPT-4 evaluated 54 written responses, ranging from 24 to 256 words in English. It assessed each response using five criteria and assigned a grade on a six-point scale from fail to excellent,…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Student Evaluation, Writing Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Timos Almpanis; Dom Conroy; Paul Joseph-Richard – Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 2025
The advent of Generative AI (GAI) tools such as ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and Microsoft Copilot has significantly impacted higher education. This exploratory study investigates the current perspectives of lecturers in Human Resource Management (HRM) and Psychology on adapting assessment strategies in response to GAI developments. Through an online…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Higher Education, College Faculty
Samuel S. Davidson – ProQuest LLC, 2024
Automated corrective feedback (ACF), in which a computer system helps language learners identify and correct errors in their writing or speech, is considered an important tool for language instruction by many researchers. Such systems allow learners to correct their own mistakes, thereby reducing teacher workload and potentially preventing issues…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Automation, Student Evaluation, Feedback (Response)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Seyma Yildirim-Erbasli; Okan Bulut; Carrie Demmans Epp; Ying Cui – Educational Technology Research and Development, 2025
Conversational agents have been designed to improve instruction quality and support student learning. In addition to their instructional use, they can be incorporated into assessment--conversation-based assessment (CBA). This study primarily introduces a CBA with selected-response and constructed-response tests as a formative assessment tool for…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Mediated Communication, Technology Uses in Education
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6